Again, I will recommend a different tech tree for you if you don’t want Japanese aircraft to get the domestically produced missiles they used in service.
Otherwise, you’re just being a stick-in-the-mud who wants the status quo to stay the same because you’ve grown too comfortable with it.
Provide a replacement for the EJ Kai’s BR.
It already has historical loadouts.
I already do play another tech tree for IRCCM F-4 Phantom: Germany.
I don’t need 2, let alone the 2nd removing the exclusive PD F-4 from 12.X without a replacement for that BR.
That’s really just too bad, as the game does not hinge entirely on what you want.
EJ Kai getting AAM-3s was already passed to devs at some point relatively recently, so that much is clear.
Passed to devs =/= introduced.
EJ Kai will likely not receive AAM-3s.
Devs knew EJ Kai had AAM-3s an entire year before it came to War Thunder.
Devs know plenty of things that were only implemented later (and some that have yet to be implemented despite being promised).
J-7E PL-8 PL-5C
J-8B PL-8 PL-5C
J-8F PL-8B
JH-7A PL-8B KD-88 PL-12
China still lacks a lot
AMX-30B2 BRENUS w/ the OFL 105 G2, G3, or even the powerful F2 APFSDS-T round and moved up to 9.0-9.3 to differentiate it from AMX-30B2. Balancer would be its lack of stabilizer in exchange for high pen. Would have to be a sniper. Currently, the AMX-30B2 and AMX-30B2 BRENUS are the same BR.
CN-105 F1 Cannon Ammunition Chart courtesy of @CaID.
And AIM-120B (placeholder), AIM-9M, and AIM-9P-4 for ROCAF F-16A MLU.
this chart is old and outdated. here is the new one with the measurement verified and redone for each rounds based on the actual rounds
the G2 and G3 performance was nerfed and happen to be very close to the information shared by Giat industry
Thanks for the updated chart 🤙
Do you have an updated French Armament and Ammuniotion Catalogue forum page like your old one?
no, I do not sadly. a lot of the information in the old one remains correct. and I still use it once in a while. but it’s still incomplete. there were hours of work behind it and I also worked on dozens of other projects at the same time so I had to prioritize something over the other.
also, the new forum is incompatible with the table format. so I do not know if I will ever make a new one.
also, I would love to see the Vextra with the OFL G2. it would allow it to be higher BR and since most players take it with the Leclerc in their line-up, it’s clear it needs a bit of buff (and a higher BR coming with it)
I think it will get its buff. Seeing how the modification tree layout is for it, it’s likely going to get a new round. At least imo.
Also thanks for all the work into the catalogue, it’s helped out quite a bit.
Afraid you wouldn’t be happy with what pylons the R-73 take up on the prototype MLD that received the R-73.
It’s either you have long range SARH/IR missiles like R-24 or you get 2 improved short range IR missiles to go with 4x R-60M. The R-73 used R-24 pylons under the wing gloves, so it’d be a pretty significant tradeoff. Can’t just whole cloth replace the R-60M with 4x R-73 and 2x R-24.
That is incorrect. The current F-15C has the APG-63v1 which replaced the APG-70 on C and D airframes. The F-15C would only have the dual wing pylon amraam rails with the APG-63v3 radar. But only the F-15EX has actually flown with the dual wing pylon, not the Cs. The dual CFT rack was just a fit test.
Thats incorrect. Based on tail number, the F-15 ingame would have left the factory with an APG-70. Only after retrofit would it have had the APG-63v1.
Easy to fix all of that
Make suggestion
“Premium Modules” …4.99 each and they will be implemented faster than you can say “Russian Bias”
yeah i know
This would be very optimistic. It should also get paveways and sniper-XR, but gaijin mistreats both sides of the strait equally, like, where m1a2t etc.
Which tail number? There are multiple skins. ;)