Once again all your arguments are based in “im bad, so the problem are the vehicles and not me” .
And not, they are very good tanks and planes and the problem is your lack of skill.
If this tanks have so high win ratio is not only for me, is more because in reality they are good.
Another great example the real problem is between your chair and your screen.
Im using the Italian Hellcat in 6.3 supporting the old M26 lineup and more recently in 6.0 with the Tigris and do extremly well, so stop crying, Hellcats are far from dead.
So with the recent engine power buff to the M18 GMC, I’ve been grinding it’s modules (I never played the tech tree version since I own the Black Cat) and I’m already nearing a 3-1 K/D in a stock tank.
It’s extremely powerful for 5.7 and I see no issues with it going up to 6.0.
For context, the M18 GMC now has superior acceleration to a XM-1, T-80U, Leopard 2, etc. it runs circles around the most modern MBT’s we have, it’s absolutely cracked.
I don’t think the M18s are dying from going to 6.0. Sure, it is a fairly large jump since 6.0 has no real line up (for the US, I don’t know about italy or china), so you have to pretty much use it at 6.3, but even still it’s an exceptionally mobile tank with APHE.
I’m more just sad that the 5.7 lineup is losing an extremely potent light tank specially as that is one of my most favorite lineups as I love the M4A3 (76) and the M36s, but it is what it is. I imagine something like the T37 could be used to fix the gap between the M24 and M18.
No one called it a bad tank, but Hellcat shouldn’t see 7.0
The priority should be decompression. If you put it at 6.0, you slash the 5.7 lineup in half AND place the Hellcats at a BR where only one other tank is located in the US. This tank is the M4 T26, which is over tiered and never used. This would only create more one-death Hellcat leavers. If there were other 6.0 options, then it might be a decent decision, but a light tank shouldn’t be the focus of an entire BR.
You’re not allowed to own more than one account. I don’t know why, but those are the rules. If you do own more than one, probably don’t mention it here…
Like I said, the issue here is compression and missing sections of tech trees. The Hellcats are great at 5.7, but they’re not anywhere near 7.0 worthy. You’re just going to be creating a ton of one-death leavers.
No. Just no. Mobility is not the way to look at this vehicle. The Super Hellcat is mediocre for a reason despite maintaining that mobility. Speed isn’t everything. Firepower is a massive factor and the 76 is decent at 5.7. Placing that gun into 7.0 matchmaker is just going to make using it playing on hard mode.
If you want the Hellcat to go higher, either improve 6.0 for America or decompress the battleratings in midtier.
An insult is not a proper counter to an argument. I’ve made this statement before, but I will restate so you understand. You have played 70 THOUSAND GAMES. If you play mid-tier, you will eat anyone alive in anything. You are falling for Confirmation Bias. I never called the M18 bad, in fact, I’ve consistently called it great. I’ve raised other issues such as the horrible American 6.0 lineup as well as the Hellcat not being sufficient for 6.0 matchmaker. You can say that’s not true, but the Super Hellcat has a seriously hard time. I’ve about had it with your half-truths to this community.
Insults are not civil. That statement is a fact, and we’ll continue to go around with this until you comprehend that having your time on this game puts you at an advantage against 6.0 players. Considering I have 6000 hours at 13,000 matches, I can only imagine you have 15 thousand at least with the number of matches you’ve played, lest you bot or leave early.
