Vehicles that are in an unbalanced battle ratio

mad-max-tom-hardy

You can’t be serious. It was added at 7.7 and now it’s risen to 8.7 and that’s still not enough for you? I hardly see the thing being played anymore, that’s how much it’s fallen off. There’s no reason why it should be higher than M3 Bradley which has a better gun, thermals, and TOW missiles.

Well, the thing is that thats why im saying the t55A is better and does really fine at 8.3 xD i can barely remember japanese tanks but i think at 8.3 they have a really great stb or something like that

Be a rat my son, be a rat,get the side, easy boom

Well, they could fix the aphe damage yes, but its gaijin,they wont do that tbh, spaghetti code game,but if they just made them use HE they could be able to pen light tanks (wich would be fair) and they should increase the rewarda of killing planes while u use an AAA’s because for real an AAA is a necesary part of the team, the CAS players are really anoying and can determinate the end of a match

Ayo sorry, im spanish so im doing my best to read, and write in english xd i also speak a lil bit of french and german but i can fail sometimes

XM800 is still quite good. People stopped playing it in mass because it stopped being a braindead hold W stomp vehicle at 7.7

Scimitar is there and is just as potent. however after the remodel and that spall plate got added its a lot harder to pull off. Its not like when fox was first added. nor should tanks ever feel “safe”

WTs hit registry just sucks. the problems im having with sherman 76mms on tigers and panther mantlets rn is annoying

The only thing it has going for it is scouting and pest(light tank) removal. The second you’re facing a medium tank you’re now playing a survival horror game. And you also have to compare it with other 8.7 light tanks which are simply superior.

Tbh, bradley is just bad, is the first time i see someone saying bradley is good, slow fire rate, it is slow,it has big profile,no consistent damage, bad precision of the shots, and u gotta wait 3-4 seconds to shoot the Tows. Is not trash, but is not good, is just an average ifv, i really preffer the bmp2 tbf, thats why u see a lot of people using the xm800t and not the bradley, anyway, the bradley of 9.7 is nice,but i stil preffer the xm800t

Light tank deleter is an actual role in this game. See: the numerous 9.3+ vehicles that only get 25mm autocannons. It’s not like the game isn’t saturated to death with light tanks. Scouting is also always effective

Well, quite fair, but as i said, the problem is that the fox is really fast so u can get a position really fast, scimitar is not that fast

Ayooo, i love 76w shermans, they are my favourite 5.0-5.7 tanks. Idk, i dont remember having troubles with these shermans, but yep, WT register of damage is pretty bad

It’s the opposite for me, I prefer the 8.3 Bradley over the 9.7 one. The early Bradley has more features that stand out and are unique for it’s BR while the later one feels outdated compared to it’s peers.

I think you simply can’t rush in with the early Brad, you gotta play it methodically. And unlike the XM800T the Bushmaster can actually penetrate the sides of T-series tanks.

Yesss,scouting is really op and does help the team a lot, a great player using a drone can for real change the end of the match

TURM 3 is the only under-BR’d tank in that list though.
T-55A especially isn’t under-BR’d, T-55A is just the Soviet version of the M60 AOS.

Yep i know, anyway, i dont like slow gameplay, i mainly play with medium and light tanks to rush, i cant rush with the bradley and i get really anoyed when i gitta wait for my ATGM launchers to be ready for fire its like “omg, the target is moving, he is going to hide, please prepare the launcherssss” and by the time they are ready the enemy tank just said bye bye

T-55A, Type 69, T-72A, 685, 800T, Fox are all fine where they are.

1 Like

Naaaah, T55A does have low profile, apfsds wich is a reskin of the apds but better because its apfsds, also,maybe im wrong but the apfsds of the t55A does pen more than the first apfsds of the 10.7 abrams, u also have better mobility and speed than the m60. U also get acces to APCBC wich is still good at 8.3 and a really good HE. (Dont miss that the .50 cal is also better)
In the m60 AOS u just get the stabilized gun, but u get a worst apds than the one in the 8.0 m60,big profile, bad mobility,a inconsistent heat fs, and a really slow .50 cal.
I would say that u can compare the t55A with the t95 (90mm gun,low profile,good armour,apfsds,but no stabilized gun), but the m60 AOS is not as good as the t55A

The T-55A’s APFSDS is just APDS that won’t shatter if you hit angled external armor. That’s it.
10.7 Abrams pens infinitely more than T-55A’s.

M60 AOS has slightly better APDS than the T-55A’s APFSDS, and both have HEATFS rounds.

1 Like

AYOOO type69 is a crime at 8.0, u get apfsds, good armour, stabilized gun, lrf and .50 cal, yes, the apfsds is not as good as the russian one, but u get lrf, is a fair trade and anyway, is still a 100mm apfsds

Just because something is a dart doesn’t mean it’s automatically better.

1 Like

I hate when the ammo just shatter tbh, thats why i preffer apfsds

On flat big maps yes. On bump maps not at all. if they have to turn in an urban area too the scimitar will keep up more than well enough.

Genuinely they are two sides of an even coin. one cant turn at all, one cannot break 100kph.

they are amazing. theres no reason why panthers of all things are the same BR other than german mains being abhorrently trash but overall 9/10 to play

Apds does shatter a lot, so, 99% of the times apfsds is better, just the small caliber apfsds are bad, like the one in the chinese m41