Year old and only accounts for Germany. This is essentially meritless.
wouldn’t say that to be sure germany rounds aren’t far of from other NATO ammo
Well im gonna have to translate a 138 page document to make sure nothing was a miss read
And despite those issues it still performed well enough to stomp most vehicles it fought because they were inferior, and it still does. Also a single day of 90% WN8? You got a source for that?
Aight then? So the only limiters for these aircraft’s mobility post-G Limiter removal is crew skill, mod levels and structural integrity. And you’re taking exception to that? Sounds like you’re just a salty Ivanboo but I’d like to believe that’s not the case, unless it is?
No counter? It had plenty of counters. What a purposefully ignorant and dishonest statement.
They were using outdated penetrators. Again, that " source " speaks only for Germany. Nobody else.
The current Leopard 2 generation of main battle tanks currently uses KE ammunition with penetrator technology from 1995. Modern reactive armor (Explosive Reactive Armor; ERA) such as the 3rd generation ERA (Relikt), which is also retrofitted to older types of Russian main battle tanks and (e.g. use in MBT T72B3, MBT T90M/MS), can no longer be successful with the existing KE ammunition
be fought. There is therefore an acute capability gap for the entire Leopard fleet in Germany and
in the global 120 mm user community including all NATO partners.
What it says man if the Germany says it isn’t good enough then it isn’t good enough
2 Likes
It didn’t stomp nothing due to its performance before the FM change.
Me playing it around that first week, absolute cancerous experience.
Great arguement lil bro
LMAOO, what the MLD? Which only the soviets had? NVM you are the typical usa main.
Which only applies for Germany. You attempted to claim it applied for all of NATO, which it doesn’t.
You mean the strongest nation in the game at every single BR without fail?
1 Like
You claim USA Main yet there’s plenty of Japan with some Germany, UK and Italy sprinkled in.
You’ve proven you’re not worth engaging with further. We’re done here, lil’ bro.
Insane, so like 80% usa main. You share the same mentality either way. Having subpart statistics on meta vehicles and making claims about who gaijin is biased towards… lmfao im out
strange
What’s strange is that you fail to understand that most of NATO isn’t using munitions provided by Germany.
Your reading comprehension needs work. Improve it.
Yeah mate i know that but if you use your reading comprehension they say all 120mm rounds used by NATO which includes the American and British rounds which to begin with i doubt are miles ahead of the Germans is not sufficient
You are correct, they are weak as hell just look at what is happening in Ukraine. Russian tanks are rolling BBQs.
2 Likes
XD, while this is true in current warfare, it’s only because of poor Cold War tactics, meant to be used against NATO forces, not only that, Russian tank doctrine wasn’t, and still isn’t very good, and they, as a whole, are not being utilized well across the “eastern war” and henceforth their effectiveness, keep in mind, with very undertrained tankers, or lack there of effectiveness.
On another note, Russian tanks are (modern ones) not bad in any sense. Their older ones though (wwii) were horrible. Their Cold War designs were so BSC, the only thing to be able to take a few of them out were just aircraft. Russia is in no sense suffering in war thunder.
Watch out By the way, if you mention “eastern war” (Ukraine) you might get flagged by them for being political.
Yeah or banned
The thing is the document speaks abou the “mayority” of the german leopard fleet, seems like they want to make the Neo round downwards capable with l44/55guns.
The performance of the L55A1 gun combined with DM73, is enough to combat modernized russian tanks, just that we have to few of those variants, thats why the neo is supposed to be developed rounds are cheaper the more tanks with 55a1 cannon
Exactly, seeing as how he isn’t responding, either he did, or he just has no reply.