XD ppl complaining about the F117 as if it isn’t only getting 2 bombs, on a crap airframe, with no A2A missiles or guns.
Fr, that thing is cool but soooooo limited…i cant see why people would complain about it, there are far stronger CAS vehicles than that thing 🤣
Are people actually doing that? Lmao
Only person i have seen complain is some dude upset that it will ruin the “cold war immersion”
Yep. Alvis Wisla also thinks it’s be OP and should be at 10.0+. Some even want it 11.0+
1 Like
Not surprised Mr.“takes opposite position on everything” is saying that.
1 Like
2 LGB’s at 10.0, you know what else have LGB’s at 10.0? Nothing.
You know why it didn’t get AtA or Guns? because it would be game breaking. (It also doesn’t have guns…)
It’s an F-117, it was designed in like the late 70’s are a pure stealth platform, you don’t need to be maneuverable when no one can see you.
Literally every presented point is moot.
Do you think the F-117 is OP?
I agree with people more than disagree.
Let me know when you can quote when i said that.
Basically only thing i have stated about it is that it wont be used much in air rb.
You said that you have the opposite opinion of me on F-117, which means you have the opposite opinion of the WT community on F-117 as my take is shared among ten-thousands.
So yeah… maybe you shouldn’t speak without researching peoples’ positions first.
I get told that you think it is op. I state that i think the opposite of that. Opposite of being op is not being op.
1 Like
Maybe you shouldn’t believe other people, cause I never said it’s OP; the ONLY thing I commented on F-117 about is its plausible BRs and when separate BRs were announced I said F-117 could easily be in development “now” [as in back then].
Apologies if my words sounded harsh.
I can incorrectly talk stupidly when irritated.
Glad we agree on F-117, and I retract my first response.
1 Like
don’t feed that guy.
He just wants to write another ton of null replies.
on Tornado GR.4 Topic, He never flew with Su-25SM3 but said that it isn’t OP because ‘I flew with Harrier GR.7 which is western Su-25SM3’
Sincerely, Don’t waste your time.
and your point is?
because it didn’t get them irl
indeed
which is why maneuverability would be important for F117, cause people can still see you
@Stockholm_Blend Sorry to burst your bubble, but Su-25SM3 is OP and always has been. There’s a reason it moved from 11.7 to 12.7.
You are wrong to have in your post “it isn’t OP” when no one ever posted that to my knowledge prior to your post now, incorrectly attributing something to someone else, likely made up.
It honestly wont do much in air rb. In ground, it can do well but the limited bomb load will cripple what it can do.
I really want to use it though but i will have to wait for the squadron rp to slowly trickle in.
1 Like
You don’t understand air combat obviously
It has something, uh, 2 things that nothing else has at that BR.
So every plane should be identical?
Still, you never flew with Su-25SM3.
Just like when you told us that you ‘flew Tornado ADV stock [fine] while stock grind of it was hard.’ while the K/D rate or Kill per Match rate of your Tornado F.3 were below average.
According to your statistics, some of your testimony seems untrustworthy.
1 Like
No, but the point is it’s being complained about by the recipient.
well then I see no problem with a plane that has crap flight performance, no A2A capability, no
and counter meassures, to have something special that no other plane gets.