This community is wild 🙄
1 Like
Projecting much? I see only Russian players cry about not having the best in the game despite still being very good and already having best SPAA and CAS in the game and an amazing heli.
Keep crying about Sweden when all it has over Russia is better tanks with shitty thermals, helis are trash, SPAA is good but still worse Pantsir and CAS is shitty Mavericks limited to only 4.
4 Likes
Russian players defending NATO is no different to the English speaking forum constantly defending Soviet tech.
It must be tiring for the level headed Russian speakers over there that have to deal with that.
“no u”
Would be a great argument if nato whining wasn’t 70% of the forum, just like the op post
Also the minor players entitlement is through the roof
“i should have stuff better than one of the biggest arms exporters with more experience in military field because… im swedish or something”
There are Russians who aren’t selfish and greedy, but unfortunately that’s the minority, most of them unsurprisingly play USSR and complain as soon as one nation gets something good that was lacking in other areas for years and they want something better for Russia to be added despite them not even needing a such vehicle.
1 Like
Okay let give every tech available in US military to US then and see what it will look like because they are the biggest arms exporter in the world with way more experience in military fields and being most successful in combat too
3 Likes
Where’s Ukraine?
Because it not a member, bruh?
Eventually it will happen, i don’t get why you’re crying though
“Eventually” means after 2-3 years, once the Russian tech tree already got something better. That’s Gaijins way of balancing things here, it always applies to other nations but hardly ever to USSR. Like how Gaijin refused to add SPYDER to Israel, a nation hardly anyone plays with the excuse of “it will be too OP” but had no problem adding Pantsir to Russia, one of the most popular nations in the game and then also adding Su-25SM3 with 20-30km range on KH-38ML’s that outranges all SPAAs. Considerations for balance goes out the window when it comes to Russian vehicles.
3 Likes
How long is this “eventually”? 1 year? 2 year? Or wait another 10 year? USSR just keep getting advance weapon while NATO still had to use the weapon from 90s is just not fair
2 Likes
Actually, Mavericks entered service in 80’s, not 90’s.
2 Likes
Is it russias main fault nato hasnt made a pantsir equivalent aside from 1-2 expo vehicles or separate radar launcher systems?
Not about AA, is about the CAS.
kh38 is a 90s missile on a 90s platform, agm65d is from 1986
In service: 2012 (Kh-38ME); 2019 (Kh-36)
Where do you find information on it being in service in the '90s?
it was developed in 90s and only pressed into service later because procurement was fucky due to certain events, just like su34, just like ka52, just like pantsir
big reveal
And yet AGM114L from 1995 are not in the game
and there a reason why if you said it was US fault not make equivalent to Pantsir then it a Russia fault that not make equivalent to 114L
use logic like that it not good idea
6 Likes
Russia has an equivalent of 114L, the 305 though i don’t know why both of those aren’t in game