I can’t understand why you decided that the F/A-18A is OP on its BR?
There is bias and it is simply huge. As for aviation. The only bombers that do not fall apart from a 20mm hit are Soviet ones, the Pe-8 is still indestructible, the Il-2 is also by the way.
Second, Russia always gets the most advanced weapons, it got a helmet-mounted system that did not exist in reality, it got the best radars in the game with the exception of the new Japan. Russia got Arena M that intercepts 100% of missiles, Russia got Pantsir, Russia got Su-39 essentially with an electronic warfare system. Russia got Kh-38MT that never existed in reality, and Kh-38 has the best characteristics in the game, in fact, Kh-38 is the fastest missile in the game.
Russia gets everything but the top dash is the best.
The fact it’s performing for its BR the same that Gripen did on first release.
And while Gripen was corrected over and over again for a few months, F-18A is already correct and is a lower BR than the F-16A that has less weapons and similar capabilities.
Oh boy here I go defending NATO against disinformation again.
Pe-8s fall apart no differently than the Ju 288s. I know cause I’ve shot both with my interceptor Corsair during daily tasks, and at least one Pe-8 in a ground match where I had the AU-1 in the lineup as well.
Soviet HMS is well documented, weird of you to call NATO liars about that. HMS is also not the most advanced system, that goes to modern HMDs which are on Rafale, F-16, F-15, etc.
Soviets finally got a Trophy & Black Night APS equivalent APS… K, that means nothing.
Pantsir has never been good against CAS. It came 2 years late, just like how the new SPAA came 2.5 years late. Pantsir defeats LGBU carriers… it was introduced when IR AGMs were everywhere.
Su-39 has never been meta in-game. Su-39 also has no EW equipment in-game. IRL it might, but EW is not in-game at all. IRCM is not EW.
Kh-38MT is an AGM-65D/G that goes faster. Its seeker over-performs as much as France’s Hammer because both are copy-paste of IR Maverick. Kh-38 is no where close to the fastest missile in the game either; potentially the fastest AGM, and it’d be by margins over the previous fastest ones. The fastest missiles are all air to air though, with the fastest being F90.
Dude, your posts need to stop defending Russian equipment that hard. Use facts, not fiction.
Reducing things that low is a slippery slope to engine controls are a form of EW.
I am not one to reduce things and will reject the slippery slope personally.
And yes, I thought of all the literal meanings prior to you and it took me a long time to make sure my responses weren’t literal and instead taking expectations of others into account.
I’d understand if it were a light tank in the 1-2.7 br range (Crusader AA MK1 is horrifying to fight in a light or even some of the lighter medium tanks) but this seems a bit silly
EDIT: DERP! Wrong thread, thought I was in the new BP thread, lol oh well. Gonna leave it up anyway now 😂
Not only do I LOVE light tanks, I absolutely ADORE light tanks with recoilless rifles!!! Recoilless rifle shells have absurd armor pens, and are usually slow enough to lob over hills. Just amazing. And premium bonuses?!!YES PLEASE! 😄
I didn’t ignored a thing. The stuff @ron_23 says it bounces is a Sabot, not the dart. The pen profile of the dart in the replay makes it impossible for a bounce.
You either lack enough experience with APFSDS or you’re simply disingenuous. Considering @ileaveuptiers uploaded the serverside replay confirming that the pen profile is impossible to achieve with a bounce, i’ll leave readers alone to judge if you’re being intentionally disingenuous or just ignorant, and i humbly bet on the latter.
But what you clearly don’t know enough is about penetration profiles. The dart is penning on a neutral angle, instantly ruling out any bouncing. If it would’ve bounced, the round would easily be penning slightly upwards, and its postpen would’ve been even more abysmal to neutered by the ERA. After all, its just a 75mm.
