Maybe in four years gaijin will fix this garbage.
US bias, that’s cute
1 Like
you missed your shot tho
you hit the ground and it bounces of into that T-80
you are lucky that it even managed to damage his autoloader
you can see your round sparking on the ground
It’s the replay being funky. The shot landed correctly, it didn’t bounce. Here’s the same video but through the server.
2 Likes
Very realistic cough cough
This is a meme from YouTube.
I liked it most when they gave all Western tanks a sub-basket, which, when damaged, blocks all drives, but they forgot about Russia. Its drives are not in the basket, but in a small gear.
1 Like
I can’t understand why you decided that the F/A-18A is OP on its BR?
There is bias and it is simply huge. As for aviation. The only bombers that do not fall apart from a 20mm hit are Soviet ones, the Pe-8 is still indestructible, the Il-2 is also by the way.
Second, Russia always gets the most advanced weapons, it got a helmet-mounted system that did not exist in reality, it got the best radars in the game with the exception of the new Japan. Russia got Arena M that intercepts 100% of missiles, Russia got Pantsir, Russia got Su-39 essentially with an electronic warfare system. Russia got Kh-38MT that never existed in reality, and Kh-38 has the best characteristics in the game, in fact, Kh-38 is the fastest missile in the game.
Russia gets everything but the top dash is the best.
1 Like
The fact it’s performing for its BR the same that Gripen did on first release.
And while Gripen was corrected over and over again for a few months, F-18A is already correct and is a lower BR than the F-16A that has less weapons and similar capabilities.
Oh boy here I go defending NATO against disinformation again.
Pe-8s fall apart no differently than the Ju 288s. I know cause I’ve shot both with my interceptor Corsair during daily tasks, and at least one Pe-8 in a ground match where I had the AU-1 in the lineup as well.
Soviet HMS is well documented, weird of you to call NATO liars about that. HMS is also not the most advanced system, that goes to modern HMDs which are on Rafale, F-16, F-15, etc.
Soviets finally got a Trophy & Black Night APS equivalent APS… K, that means nothing.
Pantsir has never been good against CAS. It came 2 years late, just like how the new SPAA came 2.5 years late. Pantsir defeats LGBU carriers… it was introduced when IR AGMs were everywhere.
Su-39 has never been meta in-game. Su-39 also has no EW equipment in-game. IRL it might, but EW is not in-game at all. IRCM is not EW.
Kh-38MT is an AGM-65D/G that goes faster. Its seeker over-performs as much as France’s Hammer because both are copy-paste of IR Maverick. Kh-38 is no where close to the fastest missile in the game either; potentially the fastest AGM, and it’d be by margins over the previous fastest ones. The fastest missiles are all air to air though, with the fastest being F90.
Dude, your posts need to stop defending Russian equipment that hard. Use facts, not fiction.
yes it is, its using electricity to disrupt enemy sensors
bro i love the effort 💀
Reducing things that low is a slippery slope to engine controls are a form of EW.
I am not one to reduce things and will reject the slippery slope personally.
And yes, I thought of all the literal meanings prior to you and it took me a long time to make sure my responses weren’t literal and instead taking expectations of others into account.
Imagine not knowing that Sabot is modelled in-game, it has a hitbox and it can hit the ground.
Anyway
But let’s pretend that it’s a skill issue instead because USA bias is real because of US mains, Russia always suffers and China N°1.
And that’s why you should bounce your shots off the ground to reduce pen?
I love how you guys completely ignore the second video of what actually happened in game. It did not bounce off the ground
i love how it is not releveant to the argument the other guy made
LOL! You are afraid of a SPAA???
3 Likes
1 Like
3 Likes
IT SCARES ME!
😂 I love this thread ❤️
1 Like