Us

United States tech tree is missing different variants of its LAV’s and striker vehicles Also, US helicopters has The ability to carry AGM-65 Vehicles like HVT-L Doesn’t even exist in any American units the fact that it’s 11.3 Is delusion
The 2S38 is 10.3 The turret ring on the Abrams makes the game completely unplayable depleted wholes were added on all M1A1 After the second invasion of Iraq and Afghanistan the sep 2 Fires actively the fourth generation round choppem armor What the Abrams is made out of consist of composites and Kevlar meaning the tank has a liner to protect from spiling every Abrams have Kevlar lining

1 Like

I made it readable so that people do not have to spend time deciphering the post.

9 Likes

Every tech tree is missing many vehicles, they get added over time. Development takes resources and time.

They’re fine with hellfires, Mavs would unnecessarily raise their BR

So…? Do you want it removed? And it is superior to the 2S38 anyway so the BR is justified.

Abrams is still fine with the turret ring, if anything the bad players are what makes it unplayable.

And? This would raise their BR and we have M1A1 HC in game already anyway. M1A1 is also not a vehicle you should be complaining about. It’s probably the best 11.0 tank in game.

A better round wouldn’t impact the performance of the Abrams drastically, Abrams already has the best top tier firepower. And if it did, every other nation would get OP rounds too.

Gaijin knows this and does not qualify it as a true spall liner like on the T-90M and Leopard 2A7V. For example many T-series tanks have an anti-radiation liner than can doubly function as a spall liner, but this isn’t modeled in game as a spall liner (to my knowledge)

8 Likes

The HSTV-L does exsist its in a terrible state right now but it is currently sitting in US military storage
and its not in service because its a HIGH SURVIVABILITY TEST Vehicle meaning it was used for testing
The sole High Survivability Test Vehicle Lightweight (HSTV-L) was received  by the US Army's Armor and Cavalry Collection today. : r/TankPorn

BTW the abrams does not have a kevlar spall liner as if it did you would be able to see the weave patterns in images of the inside of the turret (also kevlar alone is not bulletproof/bullet resistant)

2 Likes

Gaijin has acknowledged that the Abrams seemingly had a sort of spall liner integrated into the armor of the Abrams. There’s a whole long as hell thread about it and acknowledged but report as well.

1 Like

On paper the 2S38 is not then better then the HSTV-L but in actual gameplay it’s stomps heads, stop deterring it is a problem stop blaming everything on bad players we get it people don’t know how to place them self they just running in blinded. If my computer has A glitch I’m gonna fix it Im not going to continue to live with the problem.

I can swear upon that you haven’t played with US helis

3 Likes

Everyone always says if we do this for the US we gotta do it for everyone else that’s laughable. If you look at the Russian tree, they get their most advanced everything except for the 14 Amara which there’s not even enough to make a battalion. The most advanced tank in the tree was made in the mid 2000s 2008 (sep2) most advanced fighting vehicle was made in the 80s (Bradley) so don’t say you have to do it for everybody else when it’s done for the Russian tech tree but no one else

1 Like

I bet you he hasn’t played with US helicopters, when other nations has fire and forget missiles the only nation who does not have fire and forget missiles for helicopters and ground vehicles but where the nation that invaded fire and forget tech

1 Like

Yep, you’ve never played with US helis nor with Hellfires 🤡

Only played few hunderd matches with KVT, doesn’t even have the top tier Abrams 🤡

Clowns are everywhere on this forum…

5 Likes

Is that not enough to say an opinion on a vehicle, or are the only valid opinions from players with 900 matches in a single vehicle?

Well, would they raise its BR?

6 Likes

Its not because 105MM Abrams does have better turret ring than 120MM models.

Next time do some research before trying to defend some clueless guy.

1 Like

That’s plenty of matches for a vehicle and he’s almost rocking a 3.0 KD so I’d say their opinion isn’t worthless.

5 Likes

This post was flagged by the community and is temporarily hidden.

1 Like

Yep that sounds right, there was a reddit post few months ago that showed exactly that.

EDIT: found the reddit post

I have the 120mm Abrams too… I’m not clueless lol. The guy attacking me lied because he’s apparently too clueless to realize M1A2 is Rank VIII.

What did I lie about?

1 Like

Thats what i hate most.

People with zero experience on high tiers Abrams or Us vehicles loves to do trash talking all the time.

1 Like

Your stats with US helis… Ohh wait… there arent any 🤡

image

Yet you dont have a single clue about their issues.

Needless to say you have no idea what you’re talking about.

2 Likes

But when someone who does have experience comes and says that they are good, that person is suddenly hated by all American mains. (see a certain user who does extremely well in them, but gets called a Russian shill)

3 Likes