The fact is that people talk about the Maverick, when in reality it is a general problem affecting the entire ground-attack weapons it is not a problem with the AGM-65, but rather with the tanks models.
i think both well mainly the missiles
Maybe, but the bombs have already ricocheted; they’ve bounced off the tanks. Missiles have the same flaws , bounce tanks, ricochet, early detonation, etc., etc.
Honestly, it’s just as I told you before don’t blame the AGM-65 just use it more intelligently and you’ll get better results
Ok but you can’t see the message in what they’re saying?
Perfect
imagine as I told you two of these are clearly modelling issues with the tanks, not a problem with the missile. And it’s obvious you’re firing the missiles all over the place you need to aim properly to get better angles AGM-65 hitting the lower plate is inexplicable.
hey bud, you don’t control the agm-65, its controlled by itself. Where it hits is up to the missile. Hope this helps, lmao
You are limited, but objectively speaking, it’s different to launch a Maverick at a 10° angle or from a top-down position, but anyway…
Sure! And yet, you can still have your agm65 hit the lower plate when fired at a 50 degree angle.
The missile can hit the most ridiculous places imaginable players must position themselves to mitigate this possibility.
hey so remember when you just assumed somebody wasnt doing these mitigations
Objectively speaking, all the AGM-65s he showed were front hits, from completely unusual angles.
Hey, already addressed
1 in 10 not 10 in 10
try RB 75T with better warhead
1 Like