I thought it was a nerf since type 10 has 4 second reload.
Maybe that’s what they think but still its such a BS way to nerf it. Type-10/TKX armor is already nerfed compare to real life values so why would you go and nerf the gun handling as well?
the BMPT shreds the type 10 frontally so I’ve noticed more people bringing the oplot instead. Imagine if Japan didn’t get the oplot and were stuck with type 10/tkx against the BMPT. Crazy
Meanwhile I refused to grind OPLOT and hunting those pesky BMPT’s in my Type-10/TKX be like:

That also decreases your max elevation/depression angle so when you drive down from a hill with “additional depression” all you can shoot is worms. And cant get your guns on any flying threats. Also keep in mind that adjusting suspension requires you to spend some time standing still. Not something you can do mid fights. I have played kpz70 and bmp3 so I know how it works.
They arent. Especially elevation speed. You can check out t72b3, t90m, t80bvm, leo2 and see acceptable rates.
Since TKX doesn’t have any sort of proxy round it’ll be waste of time to engage air units with main cannon.
It takes couple seconds which is not game breaking since you should be already on good flanking position.
This guy told me to check my most played tanks lmao.
Those are not acceptable rates, those are perfect values and not everyone has access to them.not to mention Russian top tier tanks should be stuck with 5 degree elevation speed like premium T-80U-E1 because of using same FCS but Gaijin refuses to fix it.
I constantly play with tanks that has worse elevation speeds or similiar values so its more than acceptable.
As I’ve said before don’t make hard claims about a vehicle that you don’t own.
Even more disadvantages
Adjust it for one position, then adjust it to change position, then adjust it for another position. While stuff like abrams can always have their gun on target. You really dont see the issue?
That doesnt really justify type 10 elevation speed values being one of worst at top tier.
Oh yes I cant say vehicle X is good or bad because I dont own it. Its not like I have played better vehicles and can compare their parameters with type 10 values and make conclusions. By your logic, I cant claim kh38mt is best agm because I dont own any kh38mt slinger. Cant claim t90m is inferior to t80bvm because I dont own t90m.
They can buff the Type 10 now… look at how OP those BMPT are.
Despite their nerfs they perform well enough according to statistics so Gaijin will most likely not gonna buff them anytime soon.
also type 10
fastest reload of any top tier mbt fastest reverse of any top tier mbt best thermal gen reload and round at top tier of any mbt 2 tkx back up vehicles all with LWS gen 3 and 4 second reloads and 1 tkx with type 10 round too vs someone who doesn’t know to to play the type 10
and yes i also have t90m and let me tell you i prefer adaptability over just having good armour with no other benefits
Cosplaying rock wow. Abrams can do same without having to mess with suspension every time you get into position or change it.
The only big advantage. Tho abrams and leclerc have 5s which is still 2nd best reload. Both of them have those reload rates since 10.7 and 11.0 btw (m1 abrams and msc).
Other nato tanks have fine reverse speed and leclercs have almost identical hp/t ratio (while others have slightly worse values)
Okay but its not really helpful. 2a7hu also has 1200x800 thermal btw.
Its called m829a2 which can be found on 12.0-12.7 abrams
And there are backup abramses with better armor, better gun handling, better round and extra crew mate which improves survivability. 3 strv 122 with better armor, gun handling and extra crew mate. Those are pretty much major advantages unlike bit higher thermals resolution yknow. Add to that fact that you can utilize those advantages at 10.7, 11.3, 11.7 (or even 9.0) on earlier abrams models.
T80bvm exists if you want “other benefits” in your soviet lineup btw.
Or the 2S25M if you want to larp as a cardboard box with a cannon and 3rd Gen Thermals
t80bvm is a disgrace of a tank IRL and in game doesn’t even have CITV a 2017 tank btw. Bro yapping because his russian funny how literally every pro player likes the type 10. meanwhile safest t80 series send its crew to space
6s reload vs 7s on t90m, higher hp/t than on t90m and 11 km/h reverse speed vs -4 km/h on t90m. Id take that over citv tbh
You are making things up it seems
And on tournaments pro players use abrams, leclercs or leo 2
Abrams doesnt do that. Also hey, at least t series can take a hit to a turret without exploding entire tank. Type 10 can be penned and ammoracked by hitting turret from front. And hull if you have some ammo outside autoloader.
I feel like all the photos of Japans infantry I’ve seen, they’ve always be Aura farming.
As someone who has the type 10 spaded and the t-80uk less that half spaded, id prefer the t-80 anyday. The type 10 has been butched since launch and should be fixed
T-62 is a medium tank.
T-55AD is a medium tank.
T-80UK is a 2nd gen - a gen1 MBT with enhanced protection.
Perhaps yes, autoloading should not affect generation, but it makes Abramses and Leos look oldies like they are compared to Leclercs or K2
it is not. It needs to hold 600mm KE - it holds 600 mm KE. Type 10 armor is not underpowered
I’m sorry, but the more you try to explain it, the more clear it becomes that it’s a meaningless exercise.
T-62 is most certainly an MBT.
T-55 Drozd has an active protection system, by your definition that makes it 3rd gen.
T-80UK has an active protection system/electronical warfare, that makes it 3rd gen.




