You clearly did not try a SEP because if you did you wouldn’t say this.
The driver eats the shell sometimes and its a tricky spot to aim at because there’s a chance you could hit the ERA.
Don’t get me started about the Russian ERA and how it overperform.
BVM has far less armor than T-90M, 2A7V, and Strv 122.
lol If this mattered Strv 122s would’ve been the top performers permanently.
BVM would be around Abrams in practice.
What matters at most at top BR is player placement, mobility, and ammo.
Soviet ERA does not over-perform in the slightest. By all means keep calling NATO liars for testing the ERA themselves.
I’ll have 2A6 anyday, anytime over T90s and T80s cuz it ain’t get shit gun depression+reverse gear and actually competent on hill maps
They did outperform every nation and had the best WR in GRB.
Armor is what matters Alvis take your meds.
It is check this thread.
What does skill have to do with them being OP or not?
Also that topic proves Soviet ERA does not over-perform.
Hey I don’t mind anything else but heavily armoured quote VT4A1?
Does it beat leos and late abrams in mobility? A friend of mine just tried it out and, through he was disgusted by the track friction, he told me that he was able to be faster
Honestly, would not mind 2A5/2A6 go to 11.7
That way i would have the drive to grind them out and play 11.7 lineup, avoiding top cas.
But mostly would prefer decompresion, so all 11.7 and 12.0 would go up, so 10.7 would be playable again
Putting Chinese tanks anywhere else but the dump is a straight up lie. They’re so awful, legit 0 redeeming qualities.
Not for VT4, it’s reverse is just 17km rather than 34 and annoyingly rather the mobility sucks a bit due to the fact that it is quite heavy and if u go very fast it kind of drifts too much. ZTZ99A is for sure faster but u can’t go full throttle either cause the stabiliser stops working at 75km/h or so.
Check the thread i posted.
Thanks, that made me laugh
maybe not the VT4A1 but the other 2 have great armor and the VT4A1 still have a better armor than the Leclerc , the tkx , the type 10 , the leo 2a5/ 2a6 / 2pso , all the Abrams , the arietes, and the challengers
Judging from my experience they arent that well armored and have classic soviet weakspots but bigger/more fragile. Tho 30+ kph reverse and other neat things might be good counterweight to that especially after having 4 kph reverse on soviets or type 96
I think what gaijin should do is not to lower certain vehicles to 11.7 but rather to raise the best ones like the leopard 2a7v for example to 12.3
I think they are doing it currently for decompression on different brs (t55s, 10.0, 10.3, 11.0, 11.3 shift to 10.3, 10.7, 11.3, 11.7 etc) so we just have to wait for changes on top tier
I hope so, because my original idea was for Gaijin to put some vehicles in 11.7 but I realize that would only make 10.7 worse, already the m1a2 Abrams is horrible to fight against with the leopard 2a4 or the t-80B
You can only blame your country, that they made a bad tank.
No problem with game here.
Sorry but I don’t think the Challenger 2E and Black Night belong in the same category as these other tanks.
If armor was the only thing that mattered at top tier the T-90M wouldn’t be more than an overhyped skillcheck.
Ironic coming from the person who hasn’t played either of the 90M and 80BVM.
The BVM is about equal to the SEPv1 and the T-90M really is just an overhyped skillcheck.
I cant blame my country because Im not chinese and my country doesnt produce chinese tanks