Tornado IDS WTD61

I don’t know why people still struggle with this: It’s common knowledge that WTD 61 used their Tornado for weapons testing over many years, and that this encompassed also the more modern weaponry like HARMs and guided bombs.

However - and that should also be clear by now - in WT this specific premium variant always was intended to represent a test Tornado in an early iteration, at the same technological level basically like the MFG variant, so with only the same weaponry as the MFG.

The ASSTA 1 variant in the tech tree then represent an already later iteration, with more advanced weaponry.

Maybe in this case the name was chosen suboptimally, implying this test variant would be equipped with all the bells and whistles ever tested, but basically it’s just a paint variant that gives it its name, as far as I see…

2 Likes

So you also dont have sources, got it…

Welcome to WT Community :3

Ye maybe, maybe the Devs should had added a Early in its Name

But when People claim it tested the AGM-65, I like to ask for there sources, because in 100% of the Cases, they dont have Sources.

1 Like

Well, but then the community would ask why it’s called Early and demand a Late be added too, as the Early implies there’s different variants…

Ah well…

Found the Comment for the WTD61 stating its a Early one from the 70s
(Report was about Addding Guided Bombs to it)

2 Likes

You can twist and turn it in every way, it wont improve the Situation :3

Maybe with the Cluster Bombs coming soon as stated in the CM Update the WTD61 gets a New Toy :3

Just add the “Early” to it then and add another variant or something?

Also, should it share the same BR as a Yak-130? KAB-500kr to the face feels very nice when all your aviation has is maybe mavericks on a Hunter F.58 and only two planes of the entire 9.3-9.7 GRB BR having CCRP, in comparison.

Knowing how Gaijin handles bomb damage it’s gonna be a “Hit” simulator and not gonna improve anything at all.

mfw I give you a wall of text
“no sources”
yeah ok bro keep defending the billion dollar company

There is literally zero reason not to add more weapons to the Tonka. Just give it an appropriate BR, and boom problem solved, I have no idea why not also add multiple variants of it too considering how thin the German air TT is (zero vehicles between 13.0 and 14.0, seriously, and they’re also decompressing it, while not adding any new ones?)

You mean this?

Zusammenfassung

Because thats the only thing even just mention the AGM-65, and Issue with that is that it comes from a VERY EARLY Stage with stuff which was Planned at some stage but never happend…

Do you even know what Sources are?
As example Pictures of the Weapons System on the Plane
ARMIGER on a Tornado IDS as example, or when it would be written in the Flight Manual (Must be Unclassiefied, otherwise you will Disappear)
eabc5aed286ef1340432260d00987f6923b312eb

Literally also gave you the site that houses a bunch of pictures of planes and all, but you do you.

Dude, I asked you for sources for the AGM-65, not about the LJDAM/HARM/Taurus/HOPE/etc…

If you dont Understand what a AGM-65 is or better a Source for it, its not my problem

1 Like

My armiga.

can a ARMIGER borrow a fry?

1 Like

If they give it MW1, sales would increase massively. Im tempted to get it in the sales exclusively for MW1 but i don’t want to risk it incase it doesn’t.

I mean, they would be (Censored) to not add MW1 to it, specially since it would be for Air Modes only anyway

1 Like

Yeah… I just don’t know whether to risk it in the sales.

0 interest in the German tree, but MW1 would be interesting.

Unless Italy also operated the MW1 and then I’ll just get it when i grind that tree

Wiki says Italy Ordered 100 MW-1

Hmm… So that would also be an option then

@SoyBeanInhaler do you know if and if so, which Italian IDSs could get MW1?

From what I know just the original 1980s and early 90s era could have used it (so ingame would be Tornado IDS and maybe 1995)

The only pictures I have ever seen it on Italian aircraft was just on test aircraft

c11e17a4556682bc647fbc84661082dc2cf2b1fe

Though like the Kormoran it has definitely been long retired, and I dont know if it was ever truly used operationally (probably was bought or stuff from testing was kept in storage). Unlike kormoran, there is no reason at all why you would do patrol missions with an anti-runway cluster bomb device

tl;dr italy had them in inventory but never used them (other than in for initial testing which Italy did most weapon integration for German and Italian side of the tornado program)