Enjoy your dinner
You said that Kh-38 is equivalent of AGM-65. My own feelings are kinda different, i think that Kh-29T is kind of an equivalent though still different
No accusations were made if it’s the truth
All it took was looking at the previous post of you claiming that the Mavericks are similar to the KH38:
We literally had this discussion not too long ago on a different thread, then when I brought the spreadsheet, you claimed that you already read it and it actually supports you claims that they are equivalent. No it’s not, it does the opposite.
Now all of a sudden you’re claiming that the the KH38 is better? Really? Whenever someone brings up how meta changing the KH38, you bring the Mavericks. You’re implying that they’re equivalent. Almost all conversations I had with you always end up you overestimating the effectiveness of the mavericks.
I’m talking about you ignoring me when I bring valid and truthful points. Do you know why I focus on you more than others? You constantly repeat the same lies or half truths even after being corrected on it. I’m more than happy to go over some if you’d like
1 Like
If we compare it like this(just on the raw stats, so it’s easier), comparison gets even worse
AGM-65 mostly faces Pantsir-S1/Tor-M1
To make Maverick work well you have to come into killzone of Pantsir
Kh-38 can face ADATS/FlaRakRad/ItO-90
But Kh-38 does not have to go into kill zone of SPAA to destroy them
Which makes me believe that Su-25SM3+Kh-38MT(or ML if you like that) is the best counter-spaa option in the entire game at the moment. With introduction of Su-34 it could change due to flight characteristics of airplanes
In my personal opinion Kh-38 is KH-29TE with improved flight characteristics and game would not lose anything if it was not added (since we had 29TE for what i believe, 2 major updates before 38 was also introduced
More like “vision of goodwill”
I’ve exclusively launched AGM-65s far outside their missile’s effective range, and outside custom battles, all hit their target.
Custom battles less than 10 were intercepted by the person that chose to 1v1 me.
i Really want A-200A with GR-4
Do you mean A-200C?
1 Like
yes this one thx bro
I guess we’ll have to wait and see, It would be an intersting choice for Only Britian to get a late Tornado IDS. But at the same time, I suppose Italy got the A200 (10.3/11.3 one) recently and Germany has had the WTD-61 and MFG for a while. This is Britian’s second IDS
2 Likes
is the best counter-spaa option in the entire game at the moment
The KH38 is great for this, but I feel that ATM, the Spike ER helos are even better due to the opportunity to pop in and out of cover so quickly
It may be true, but this discussion was specifically about CAS vs. SPAA and comparing the abilities of missiles
It’s unfortunate that Britain has to continue suffering in mediocrity because their ordinance would be too “game-breaking.”
It’s even more unfortunate that future US/NATO weapons will be gimped while Russia continues to have a leg up because of the Pantsir and Kh38s. US players have complained about lackluster performancs and always getting older versions of their things for the last couple of years. So much for “don’t worry, you’ll get the better stuff eventually.”
12 Likes
Mavericks have never been meta. They have always been trash.
It’s better to cancel the camp grouping and let the Russian camp players go play against themselves
Yep. Partially it is because of one reason. If everything that is missing would be given to other nations - USSR would be unplayable. Devs could balance everything well enough, but for the last year this “balancing” gets more and more ridiculous
1 Like
tbh… this jet shouldn’t be added. If you refuse to even find an alternate means to model its defining weapon in a way that retains the identity of said weapon. The plane shouldn’t be added to begin with.
you had various options and chose instead to completely take away the identity of a weapon.
5 Likes
It’s funny when Russians make it so obvious they’re doing mass false-flagging cause they’re upset NATO is getting another OP CAS aircraft.
Tornado GR4 will be great no matter how many times you false-flag us.
2 Likes
It’s almost like a fetish at this point. Like that South Park cable company meme.
“Oh, your missile doesn’t have its full capabilities? Ohhhhh that’s too bad. Yeaaaahhh that’s really unfortunate.”
I just remembered the other asinine things Gaijin has done to NATO vehicles. Like using the wrong model on the KVT. Putting the US AV-8B+ at Rank 8, 13.0 with stock 9Ls instead of the 9Ms. The infamous “Well, since the Soviet scientists couldn’t figure out how to make their IGLAs pull more than 12gs, everyone else will use the same”. Also, any Western ATGM carrier like the Bradley and LOSAT will immediately have its missile dive downwards for the first three seconds for absolutely no reason.
19 Likes
who’s the russian? out of curiosity
No, the Italian One will be Better for air battles (thanks to a bigger amount of different jdam’s, like the GBU39, 31, 32, 38 ecc) while the gr4 Is obiously going to be better in grb thanks to brimstone. The German one Is not going to have any advantage over the others two.
@gaijin
So you can artificially nerf weaponry by removing its features.
Now my question is - why, in that case, cant you remove high performing AP rounds from SPAAs to stop them from doing the unintended activities?
3 Likes