Yep. Partially it is because of one reason. If everything that is missing would be given to other nations - USSR would be unplayable. Devs could balance everything well enough, but for the last year this “balancing” gets more and more ridiculous
1 Like
tbh… this jet shouldn’t be added. If you refuse to even find an alternate means to model its defining weapon in a way that retains the identity of said weapon. The plane shouldn’t be added to begin with.
you had various options and chose instead to completely take away the identity of a weapon.
5 Likes
It’s funny when Russians make it so obvious they’re doing mass false-flagging cause they’re upset NATO is getting another OP CAS aircraft.
Tornado GR4 will be great no matter how many times you false-flag us.
2 Likes
It’s almost like a fetish at this point. Like that South Park cable company meme.
“Oh, your missile doesn’t have its full capabilities? Ohhhhh that’s too bad. Yeaaaahhh that’s really unfortunate.”
I just remembered the other asinine things Gaijin has done to NATO vehicles. Like using the wrong model on the KVT. Putting the US AV-8B+ at Rank 8, 13.0 with stock 9Ls instead of the 9Ms. The infamous “Well, since the Soviet scientists couldn’t figure out how to make their IGLAs pull more than 12gs, everyone else will use the same”. Also, any Western ATGM carrier like the Bradley and LOSAT will immediately have its missile dive downwards for the first three seconds for absolutely no reason.
19 Likes
who’s the russian? out of curiosity
No, the Italian One will be Better for air battles (thanks to a bigger amount of different jdam’s, like the GBU39, 31, 32, 38 ecc) while the gr4 Is obiously going to be better in grb thanks to brimstone. The German one Is not going to have any advantage over the others two.
@gaijin
So you can artificially nerf weaponry by removing its features.
Now my question is - why, in that case, cant you remove high performing AP rounds from SPAAs to stop them from doing the unintended activities?
3 Likes
I would like for everybody to keep it on topic and avoid derailing it due to personal disputes with other users, in those cases please bring it to PM.
Please remember that talking about moderation in random threads is not permitted, if you guys have any doubts feel free to PM a moderator and we will discuss it there.
3 Likes
Well well well
11 Likes
I don’t understand the constant need of the average CAS player to die to SPAA…
It has to be a need because this behavior is not seen with any other vehicle type, not even light tanks are that reckless.
I died to exactly ONE Type 81 when its BR was 10.3, and obviously never since its BR went up to 11.3.
It’s not as if it’s impossible to learn how to play CAS effectively.
Hunter has videos on how he plays CAS effectively at the top end.
Just delete the Kh-38MT because…
Maybe I misunderstood the developer’s words?
12 Likes
i beg your pardon? equivalent? On what planet?
Both AIM-7F and ER are 100km class missiles with off-the-rail guidance capabilities.
Obviously radars limit these missiles to lower ranges.
Mig-29s can only get 80km out of ER in their best radar mode.
And F-15s can only get 75km out of AIM-7F/M out of their best radar mode.
And in ACM mode both are easily used.
Whoever launches their missile first loses the engagement.
“
I beg your pardon once again
1 Like
Don’t forget the Obj 292 from the market.
1 Like
Object 292? You mean the tank destroyer that costs more due to the medium tank label. Yeah no, not OP.
It’s like Ferdinand or Panzer IV/70. Good tanks, and not OP.
Okay.
You can be offended by the Panzer IV\70 (A) for a long time, but this does not cancel out the “one-sided game” if we start talking about red missiles or SPAA.
Can Type 81 shoot down X-38MT?
No? - remove from game because:
Guys just stop replying to alviswisla, just look at his past activity, its pointless.
10 Likes
If I died to any KH-38, it was once in the history of it being in War Thunder.
Which is about as many times to an AGM-65.
IR AGMs are easily defeated, not as easy as laser, but still easy enough.
SPAA’s goal is to frag aircraft, not their ordnance.
In-fact, missiles shouldn’t be able to destroy bombs with their explosive filler, which the last time this was tested Pantsir couldn’t destroy GBUs.
It’s true.
The guy from the red team will always be on the red side.
That’s why he doesn’t want to see the enemy’s Kh-38MT, he’s afraid.
Good!
1 Like