What about Thai players don’t you think about Thai player’s feeling at all? In comparison what is more reasonable between Chinese players feeling and Thai players feeling that the “Thai is currently using it and China has nothing to do with it at all” right? People in this forum care more about Chinese players not considering or even care about Thai players at all?
6 Likes
then japan should also recieve abrams bradleys A-10’s F-16C’s F-14’s and the list goes on by your logic
If Japan operate it, then yes plus, they already have F-15
1 Like
not really. you’d be giving a full Ukrainian vehicle to their colonisers, while in the VT-4 case, once it was sold to Thailand it became Thai first and foremost.
So the Thai VT-4 should be added, as it is just as Thai as the T-84 Oplot-T
2 Likes
This post was flagged by the community and is temporarily hidden.
I understand where the reasoning comes from, but that doesn’t mean its enough to change anything. The only communities that have a say on where the Thai vehicles should be Thai players and the recipients.
2 Likes
I outright hate this
why VT-4 shouldn’t go to Thai sub tree accounting to Chinese
when four nations in the game have German designed Leopard 2.
VT-4 in Thai service is Thai vehicles not Chinese (PLA don’t even use VT-4)
VT-4 is gonna be added sooner or later for thailand, what should be the main concern is how they will add it, like for example if they announce that they are finallly adding spall liners for you know chinese tanks that have been missing them for 2 years and then announce that VT-4 is coming it might cause a problem at first but I think everyone would be more focused on the fact that the spall liners were finally added to the ZTZ series, or they can just add it and not announce it, just showcase the vehicle on the dev stream and leave it at that is not like they announce every vehicle
1 Like
Why is no one talking about how pathetic this ERA is compared to irl testing? This is barely a 12.0 vehicle.
China never operated a Type 10 so just replying to the poor take of that guy
Speaking of Ukrainian tank’s didnt at some point JGSDF crew drove a Ukrainian T-64B?
and could in a sense mean we’d get/have a event/tech tree T-64B due to actually driving the vehicle
Then maybe we could has a Mig-25 in the future😅
2 Likes
If Japan or any of the sub trees get an Abrams, it should go in the tree. I would be fine with, let’s say Russia got a type 10, as long if Russia or a sub TT bought it.
1 Like
I made it clear that I hadn’t even understood the comment, I have a lot of difficulties commenting in English and the translator doesn’t help! I’m not saying that the Type 10 should go to China, I just used it as an example following the logic of the comment I replied to.
1 Like
I see
(I recommend using DeepL for translation to english should help a bit more)
1 Like
Can deepL easier translate English to other languages as well? I’ve been stuck using google translate.
I think this update is primarily focused around Thailand as a sub tree and giving other nations new SPAA before they add more stuff (given USSR currently has quite a wide loadout)
Correct, I use it to translate to Chinese (Simplified)
1 Like
I’ll have to try it out!
1 Like