With air top BR being 12.7 and a number of new top tanks being added recently, there is no reason for the top BR for ground to be 11.7 like it has been for a year now.
11.3
Ariete add spall liners
Ariete PSO add spall liners
11.7
Leopard 2PL remove DM43, add Pz.531/2, DM63
M1A1 AIM increase LFP armour by 35%
Ariete AMV add spall liners
Merkava 4B/LIC reduce reload to 5s (ace)
12.0
T-80BVM
Leopard 2A6s
Leopard 2PSO fix composite absorbing shells that would otherwise ricochet
Strv 122A/B
M1A2 increase LFP armour by 35%
M1A2 SEP v1 increase LFP armour by 35%
Challenger 2E
WZ1001(E) LCT
ZTZ-99A
Leclerc SXXI
Type 10
TKX
Merkava 4M reduce reload to 5s (ace)
XM1069
Tor M1
ItO 90Ms
12.3
M1A2 SEP v2 add M829A3, increase LFP armour by 35%
T-90M add 3BM-59
Leopard 2A7V fix composite absorbing shells that would otherwise ricochet
Strv 122B+
Challenger 3 add turret spall liners
VT-4A1
Leclerc AZUR add OFL 120 F2
Pantsir S1
Any vehicles not mentioned would be unchanged.
Likely to change as I get input and continue research
Chally 3, VT-4 may end up dropping down to 12.0 but I’d recommend moving them to 12.3 at first. Gaijin’s more consistent at moving an underperforming vehicle down than an overperforming one up.
odd and ends
DM63 fires the same penetrator as DM53 but with a new propellant charge. Marginally lower penetration due to muzzle velocity of 1650m/s vs 1670 for DM53.
Pz.531/2 is a Polish variant of DM33 using a segmented penetrator, providing slightly less flat but slightly more sloped penetration over DM43.
3BM-59 is a DU variant of 3BM-60 (or rather 3BM-60 is a tungsten 3BM-59) with 10% better penetration.
OFL F2 is a DU variant of OF F1. I cannot find penetration data but presumably it’s ~10-15% better than F1.
M829A3 is based on M829A2 but slightly thicker and with a steel tip to defeat ERA. DM53 also features an anti-ERA steel tip but its function isn’t modelled so I’m assuming M829A3 wouldn’t either. Nonetheless, M829A3 still provides ~10-15% improved penetration over M829A2 depending on range.
Merkava reload
M1A2 armour is complicated. Lots of yelling back and forth has pushed threads discussing the topic into the thousands of posts, making useful information a needle in a haystack. Generally based on these threads and summarized by this bug report the M1A2 (or maybe SEP?) onwards should have 35% better KE protection on the LFP, bringing it up to ~515mm. This may or may not be DU. It’s at least somewhat speculative, but that’s honestly nothing new and it’s reasonable for balancing.
The Challenger 3 doesn’t have turret spall liners, but that’s simply because it was never supposed to be used in combat. It’s reasonable to add them, and would definitely be necessary to prevent the Chally from being completely outclassed. If someone has a better idea to soft buff the Chally, let me know. Not DM73, 20% better than the already great DM53.
What do you think?