One entire second? So this is what WT players mean when they argue about mobility, truly amazing stuff
2 Likes
The only change I would ever really wanna see for the Abrams is the turret ring being fixed. Its a massive tank with a MASSIVE weakspot that negates most of its armor. (Same with Chally 2 mantlet but we know how that goes). Its a quite excellent tank otherwise. Personally I play Soviets/Russia when I want my armor to be worth a damn.
Also not surprised seeing the usual suspects in here, rent free etc.
1 Like
U.S. air is best, ground is 4-6 depending on what attributes you find to make a tank good. You can sub an Abrams out with a tk, leclerc, t series. Based on what you value, and what map will decide which ones fall where. The first 3 spots for GRB are all nations with Leo2a7’s.
2 Likes
They do need to buff/fix the Abrams turret ring.
They also should be modeling differences in rounds. All darts shouldn’t act as tungsten penetrators and be normalized for all nations to act the same way. Yet, give asymmetric spall liners to others.
2 Likes
Womp womp?
You used 1 vehicle, prob got 2 kills on ground and then everything else with air lol
3 Likes
7 of those were with the M1?
2 Likes
I don’t know enough about the game to be able to see that from medals.
You don’t know enough about the game to say this either
…So are you only here to be contrarian?
2 Likes
Your post with a picture is literally to be a contrarian lol. You do know that right?
Reread the name of this thread for me. Maybe reread it twice, I understand it may take some people a while to catch onto details.
1 Like
When people are arguing within the thread and you come in to post that, it’s to be a contrarian lol. Do you even know what the word means lol? Maybe go look it up.
“Read it twice”
I couldn’t care less what other people are saying in the thread, it’s the nearest thread that says America is actually good. I’m simply here to support that.
Are you saying you were personally offended by my image?
1 Like
“u mad bro?”
You’d have to try a lot harder for that.
What?
We’ll leave it there, seems your own words confuse you when read back to you with the sarcasm you like dousing your own responses in. Try reading it again, maybe twice for good measure. You’ll get it champ, it’s not a deep comment.
The only time I have been sarcastic is when you erroneously claimed I was being contrarian by posting a screenshot pretty relevant to the OP.
Can you tell me any other moment I was sarcastic without warrant?
It does seem like you’re pretty upset about my screenshot. To go out of your way to start an argument and try bashing me and my gameplay…
2 Likes
you got a lot of open flat map in this game, some even had a very high slope for soviet to hulldown, you have tunisia, volkokalmsk (very rare), sinai, maginot, red desert, arctic, poland, alamein, normandy
some of the map’s smaller variant usually push you into close quarter but rarely an urban close quarter. most of these maps had elevations that make it impossible for soviet tank to hull down or camp so im not sure what is the issue of abrams is not made for warthunder enviroments
there are, t80ue for soviet. canada leopard for german
If Apaches had direct fire mode, they would be far better. Or rather, Hellfires had direct fire mode.
It does actually not completely direct but similar
Other reason hellfire suck in this game it because it IOG isn’t work like it supposed to