The usa being left behind

the vidar is no freaking light either jesus


11.0 Sweden or America because it is a Finish Patria with a Lockheed Martin 40mm Modular turret

the mjolnir is a cv90 chassis so it could fill that role, just with a massive howister. obv the vidar isnt “light”. just imagine a light tank with alot of he filler.

i am fairly certain thats an autocannon and not a mortar system and no idea why you guys a tagging me into those

the chassis has nothing to do with the role
namer and sholef proof that

armament is the main factor

literaly right, thats not a mortar turret is your standard autocannon system

So is a Early Panzer 4 a Artillery vehicle or a Medium Tank?

u gotta be a bit more specific there

The mjoliner is a howitzer,

The short cannon Version Short 75

did i answer you there? i answered to momos picture

u are aware cannon rounds and mortars behave differently right?

not mentioning ww2 vs modern era and standards

Oh my b

40mm telescoped ammo autocannon, that was what i was refering to

Yes eh nvm me saying anything were getting off topic again

u 2 literaly are starting to define everything and anything as light tank
thats the main issue here

u 2 are defining stuff like the ozelot and type 93 as light tanks
they have absolutly no capability to engage enemies in any away.
they are spaas not light tanks. there is massive differences

Plenty of chinese light tanks could come try and find some modern ones.

Not type 93s, we thinking lavad, linebacker, 2s38 all of these irl are spaa that fill light tank roles.

The gun doesnt matter, unless the gun is only good at indirect fire. If it can engage 1 to 1 than it counts.

u know, your other mistake is not checking if this kind of thread already exists

back to my statement, skyranger 30, boxer rch155, boxer mortar 120mm dont fullfill light roles
they are the same as type93