lol Ive played many nations at top tier and rn im almost done with russia (I just got the T90M today)
and let me tell you… Ive never had such a easy time with a single nation. my winrates are so damn high its super funny. Especially after the su34 update Ive seen my winrate go up from 60% to almost 80% and I do
nt even have the su34 yet!!! my kd with the pansir is almost 4 and ive not yet been killed by a single F15E
the only country where i got close to such high winrates is sweden
agm-65b lock range is 6km. Roland 3, ASRAD, Osa, Tunguska, and even Strella can easily counter the A-10A early. The a10 can still lob the agm65s from 10km but all you have to do in your spaa is not stay in one place and the missile wont hit you
Yep. Farming those in the Stormer HVM is fun.
bro probably thinks AGM-65s are OP for killing SPAA or something
Love how this thread is just “RU CAS is OP” and “No, US CAS is more OP”.
Why are you comparing USSR stats from SB with Sweden’s stats from RB ?
Here are your RB stats for USSR.
oh must have been a mistake… i play a lot of sim so it must’ve defaulted to sim when i opened service record
still 70% is still alot. friend of mine who plays US has around 35% and hes a good player
and also 80% WR in ANY gamemode is WAY TO MUCH
We feel weapons that can be used outside of the direct line of sight of the target without needing any preliminary reconnaissance or direct user targeting are not currently workable for the game. Weapons such as Brimstone, AGM-114L cause a particular problem and similarly to other ATGMs that have lock after launch modes like the Spike and AJ.168 will not have such abilities in the game.
so we bring KH-38MT do u like it?
Still the funniest CM statement ever made. So many contradictions, false information and half truths that its impossible to fully to read without laughing like an insane madman
US lost loads of good players and Click-Bait spammers took over. I doubt anyone would have 50%+ WR with them at the moment lol.
That being said, all meta vehicles like 2A7s/122s/BVM/90M will have 60-65% WRs considering how many games US is losing.
Haven’t played SB so have no idea what’s happening there.
Also, drawing conclusions out of 20ish battles isn’t a good idea. I’ve had 90-95% WRs after 10-15 games.
wdym? I have over 40 battles with russia sim and over 200 in top tier russia in general in the last 2 weeks. i think thats more than enough to make a conclusion
Well no. Ka 50 easily beats the A-10 in that regard.
Ka 50 is way stronger and a bigger problem then the A 10
I was mostly focusing on your SB stuff, having over 200 battles is fine for making personal conclusions though. I’m also trying to understand what were you trying to say in your opening post ?
Not a single person ever claimed this however the opposite is true for the Su-34 with US mains crying about the Grom-1 while forgetting about the KH-38
American mains realizing Russia not only has the most powerful SPAA in Warthunder, but the most OP CAS aswell.
Meanwhile “the brimestone would be too op” lmfao
I mean it was obvious 6x KH-38 on a capable platform was going to be insanely strong. Instead most people decided to chimp over the groms which were a huge nothingburger given they were just GPS instead of focusing on what was actually going to make it powerful.
But hey NATO SAMs are already pathetic anyway so happy days.
Harrier GR7: “First time? Cute. I was the first OP unkillable thermal CAS in War Thunder.”
F-14B, F-16C, Mirage 2000s, etc all came before Su-34.
Welcome to what Soviet and Japan players have been dealing with for years.
ALL 10 tech trees of War Thunder need SPAA of SPYDER equivalent.
I’d love for you to explain to us how PGM-500-2000/3, KH-38, and AGM-65D/G aren’t OP weapons. [All share the same IR seeker range currently.]
F-15E carries the most lethality at 11 target destroying store positions with 2000 pound GBUs, or more with 500 pound GBUs.
