The Pantsir SM-SV is Simply Too Strong, Russian Bias as Clear as Day

The mobile Phalanx systems and the Skyranger wouldn’t be as good as the Pantsir, but they still would be able to intercept way more incoming ordnance than the currently available blufor anti airs can

A lot of the SHORADs that already are in the game also should be more capable when it comes to shooting down A2G ordnance, but I doubt Gaijin will ever bother to improve that, considering that they cannot be bothered to give older SPAAs capabilities that they are still missing

It’s too bad that Gaijin only ever seems to help the ground players when CAS gets completely out of hand (which usually happens when CAS players get the “cool” weapons that they keep asking for)

3 Likes

This post was flagged by the community and is temporarily hidden.

  • Fix DIRCM overperforming ability to stop IR missile.
  • Add rotor radar return so that hovering helicopters aren’t invisible to radar missiles
  • Add 1 C-RAM truck to top AA like the NASAM to shoot down missiles without having to waste precious ammo.

Boom, western AA can finally do its job.

3 Likes

Well, thats debatable since thats entirely the point…

Literally why the Commanche stealth heli didnt catch on, so step in the right direction

A dedicated cram would be good

iirc there’s a few SAMs that have the ability to fire multiple multiple missiles at once, or i’m just confusing with some data i found about the Eurotiger.

MLBPWS for the US
HVSD/ADAMS for Israel
Skyranger 30 for Germany and Sweden (Denmark)

1 Like

All SAMS in game can do that, the Pantsir is just limited to LOS and 4 targets

this should be done kinda right NOW.

1 Like

But whats the middle ground, DIRCM is DIRCM, unless it has blind spots, making it do what its not supposed to do is problematic and a whole new debate

LDIRCM can currently stop multiple missiles at once, even though it shouldn’t. Firing two IR missiles in quick succession should overwhelm a LDIRCM and ensure a hit.(LDIRCM works by blinding the missile with a laser. It can’t do that to two targets simultaneously.

Furthermore, certain missiles like IRIS have countermeasures implemented to defeat LDIRCM.

These are the two things affecting all LDIRCM helicopters right now. For the Mi-28NM more specifically, it has a DIRCM frontal protection bubble even though there’s no emitter there. So that one also has to go.

4 Likes

LDIRCM, as it’s name says, basically interrupts the IR missile’s seeker by pointing at it with a laser.
as u may already know, lasers in WT are limited to 1 target, so if u shoot 2 missiles to the Mi-28NM and it’s LDIRCM, one of them should hit, but none of them does.

Gaijin has overexagerated the LDIRCM capabilities making it a forcefield to fool all IR missiles, u can literally launch 16 IRIS-T missiles to it and none of them will hit.

4 Likes

Ahhh that makes much more sense now


What on God’s Earth did this say to trigger so many flags that it got hidden almost four days after I posted that?

I get if my information is wrong but I didn’t even insult anyone.

i’m just gonna say it wasn’t me, in any case u think i was.

this explains what DIRCM is

Zenturion7’s video talking about Mi-28NM’s DIRCM and how to fool it.

1 Like

They should call it the Magic Force Field

2 Likes

call it the “Russkie Vodka Field”

By that Logic a Tornado is easier to multipath because it is lighter?

It’s a massive stretch to say a jet is better at multipatjing because its lighter, heavier. It is purely down to flight characteristics.

FGR2 being a heavy fast lump was quite stable down low whereas Typhoon is very twitchy

no?
the logic goes that wider the aircraft, harder to multipath.
we’re talking about size, not weight.
i only said that Su-30 is obviously heavier than F-15E, not that F-15E is easier to multipath cuz it’s “lighter”.

refer to what i said above

Your ability to multipath is down to the instructor.
Nothing to do with the size.

Instructor is what makes Typhoon twitch down low but the Gripen flies great.