So we’re either being just straight up biased towards this vehicle because its new, or we’re going to send the hunter F1 to 8.3? wheres the logic?
The Buc S1 should arguable be given a airspawn, it has just been forgotten by gaijin, only way i grinded it was in Sim.
I do have several air kills in it however, you just need to use the rockets and put a distance fuse on them. (its not easy by any menas XD)
The hunter F.1 should be 8.7, there are many 8.7 planes I would rather fly out then both of them.
8.7 Sabers/Alpha jets/mig 17(pf)/lim 17/Scimitar/g.91 r/1-r/4
And just because its a strike plane should not mean its overtiered in air RB, I hate how most strike planes are overtierd, it used to be bacuse we had the same rateings for GRB but now they are seperate there is no exscuse.
1 Like
Absolutely not, 7.7-8.0 jets have zero counters or recourse. This game does not need more BR compression. In fact, more jets need massive uptiering at 8.0-9.0 than jets that need downtiers. (The downtier list has like 5 jets on it, max)
UNDERtiered jets
UNDERtiered jets
3 Likes
I agree the game needs more decompression, but since we are not gonna get a full decompresion asap does not mean some planes must suffer far more then others.
The Murat is worse then all the jets I menitoned, hell its worse then the Mysteres, and less presence then the A-4s ( of which gets 60 flairs, and all get 9bs)
You are making the problem actively worse if you ask for Hunter F1 at 8.7. It would mean almost every single 8.7 needs to go down besides the aforementioned MiGs/F-86s.
How do you not realize this ultimately means as low as 1.0 will be affected? It would push ALL aircraft down to keep insisting we compress the game.
4 Likes
I was one of the people asking the most for deompression previous patch BR updates, feel free to check my recomendations.
but you advocate for compression now
1 Like
Im talking about the Murat going down (worse then the hunter F.1), and as stated prevoiusly the Murat is worse then all the other 8.7 if we talking about game impact.
Very unlikely it’s worse than Hunter F1
Bro have you even played it yet ?
1 Like
No, I do not plan to grind this jet. Hence why I said “very unlikely” and not “It is not”
No way you are out here arguining about a planes BR when you have not even played it, that is crazy.
1 Like
I am allowed to have an opinion, especially when it is presented as one and not as me saying something “is” the way it is.
Though since you’re trying to silence my opinion based on this, I will go ahead and do the same to you.
You have 21 whole entire games in the Hunter F1. You have not played it.
You have ONE (1!) game in the HF-24 Marut.
You are a joke.
And you have zero games in it.
1 Like
This is not some clever zinger when I already said what I said was just my opinion (one of which is based PARTIALLY on what the sikh guy himself has said about the aircraft…) and that the opposite person has 1 entire whole game…
1 game and a hour in test flight, also its not just me with this oppion, watch DEFYNs video on it, he calls it a slightly better f84 and rips on it.
2 Likes
Agree. The Marut at 9.0 is an absolute boat. I would rather fly the Hunter, MiG 15 or G.91 at 9.0 than the Marut. I cannot understand why they did not add the reheat prototype or even the proposed RD-9 engined one as the event aircraft, those would have made the aircraft a better fit for the type of air combat in WT than this underpowered light attacker.
2 Likes
Its deffiently the worst 9.0 ATM in the game, A32A/J29F and FFA-P16 all are better in someway and so can play off those strengths.
1 Like
Dont be surprised if a mod locks your thread btw, mine was locked and with the comment to “use the official thread” on this exact subject with a poll showing a majority support for 8.3/7 BR.
But yeah, its BR could come down, especially so for GRB in my view.
1 Like