Only in your imagination lol
Do you know where the same army personel you called “superior to any EU force” is being trained? And by who? And why? A set of questions that will bounce a bit inside your head till it will reach it’s target, I know, but I have time to spare and so do you. Judging by how much rusian tv you apparently watch.
1 Like
thats crazy
Ukraine are handling Lancet, Lancet has a massive RCS. They can be easily detected and destroyed using systems like Gepard or even FPV drone interceptors.
While systems like Lancet have been successful the key issue with “cheap weapons” is you need to update them to defeat the counter. Your cheap drone/loitering munition then becomes more expensive as it is updated to defeat the countermeasures. Lancet started at 31K as it’s export price it was offered to other nations during the Syrian war. It has now changed so much it is likely the same price as a 60K the much maligned US Switchblade loitering munition.
Then on top of that you are not considering advanced EW and of course Lasers. Lasers are pennies per shot and can and do destroy drones. So a 20K drone designed to replace a 1500 dollar artillery shell can be intercepted and destroyed by a system that costs a buck a shot and has perfect accuracy.
Drones are not a threat to NATO
Literally rn watching lancet footage on 155 spg.
Doesn’t seem like “handke” to me
There are very few of them.
As I said Lancet is a capable system but it is counterable which is why Ukraine still have tanks because those Lancets are not always hitting the target.
If these drones/munitions worked like you think they should Russia would send massive waves and just destroy all of Ukraines SPGs, GBADS and Tanks
yet ,we’ve seen massive jumps in capability regarding laser defenses and that’s NATO research at peace time
1 Like
True but when then system is refined it can then be mounted on tanks and IFVS
Britain have a system as does the USA/China and European nations and no doubt even Russia has or is dabbling with the idea.
Failing that near every Western IFV has programmable AHEAD style rounds
1 Like
It would be foolish to think NATO and every country that isn’t directly involved is not looking at Drones and how to defeat them
It would have been easier to use thermonuclear weapons than to search for every tank in an area of 460 thousand square kilometers.
There are levels, nuking a country next to you isn’t a great idea
Absolutely, especially acting like the west slept on drones is ridiculous when you look at companies like Helsing or the abundance of loitering munitions in western arsenals. The only thing the west kinda slept on is SHORAD and even that got corrected super quick
1 Like
This is the difference between NATO and the East NATO don’t have to brag about capability.
And about the industrial and financial means to actually put these capabilities into the field.
I doubt it. Its weapon which ought to be used against your enemies. Besides modern nukes are quite good they barely pollute. Using nukes saves lives i think nuking Japan by USA proved it.
I don’t think they will they rather be safe unoess directly attacked.
But that’s a big fat nuclear if
Don’t believe in this factor. Besides russian nukes are much better. They lose more than they gain
Doesn’t matter how many because there’s enough for each
I don’t understand what’s the benefit of attacking Russia in the first place there’s literally no point to get nuked