The MI28NM problem

Both auto cannons are effective. Bradley has more pen less fire rate, also has two ATGMs vs one on the bmp.

Bradley has more survivability, bmp-2 has more mobility.

1 Like

bradly has less pen and significantly less rate of fire

  1. KH-38MT isn’t fake
  2. Additional weapons because the plane’s radar / aams weren’t all that great?
  3. I literally said they should fix the lofting for all, so I don’t know why you keep bringing that up.
  4. LDIRCM was literally added to the AH-64E first, then later during the devblog given to the Mi-28NM, therefore technically the USA got it first.
2 Likes

It has one less pen. Also, I didn’t even know they added an APDS belt to the bmp-2 lol. I played it way back when it only had APHE

Bradley also gets a thermal

38MT,s existence is yet to be proven, and its use on any of the platforms in game is absolutely fake

really? because how did they know that when it was added with missiles, and a platform that gets the extra pylons has the second best missiles in the game

because they should have at least made JAGM loft, but no, its not a russian missile so it doesnt loft

wtf are you on

MI28mn had LDIRCM for a whole update before 64E was added

3 Likes

It absolutely is and even if it wasnt it shouldnt be on the SU30SM without proof that it was ever carried by one.

So because the plane struggles in some departments we can make up new pylons?

Because youre not Gaijin? And this argument is about Gaijin giving preferential treatment to russia?

Not the point. The MI28NMs LDIRCM is on the bottom of the heli so how can it affect ammunition coming from the top? expect for magic ofc

2 Likes

hes also just straight up wrong here, with LDIRCM being added to Mi28 3 months before ah64e was added to the game

5 Likes

This is the first I’m hearing of it. And I’ve been using the Mi-28NM before the LMUR was added.

Thanks for saying I’m “on something”

Kh-38 exists
Ir seeker exists
1+1 indeed = 2 as hard as it is for you to believe.

Also, LMAO R-77 RHE SECOND BEST MISSILE?? OMG STOP IM GONNA PISS MYSELF IM LAUGHING SO HARD RIGHT NOW

3 Likes

you clearly are

because you are forgetting r77-1 exists

CKEM exists, IR seekers exist
clearly gaijin should ad IR CKEM

Wish mine did that, IRIST killed me while my belly was towards it.

2 Likes

Nice continuous ToS breach.

R-77-1 is only the best in close range dogfights. All depends on how you play against an R-77-1 carrier. If you play incorrectly, then that is on you.

I was slamming Su-30SMs with Aim-120Bs and fleeing with no problem.

1 Like

you have a whole 8 games with planes that get amraam

maybe you should stop making stuff up


Flying around like this or what?
Also good job trying to distract from the other points

5 Likes

Was tipped back not belly up lol. But alright dude. Make more things up.

1 Like

That’s what you and the nato mains are doing. I am not.

Remind me, you’ve only played USA correct? Or like 99% of your experience in the game is USA only?

2 Likes

Geee someone has a great senes of humor.

What exactly are we making up? You kinda missed answering most of the points i made ecept for the IRIS T one

Not after someone tried to be insulting and so on during the whole conversation.
Nor does sarcasm carry well over the internet

LDIRCM, where is it mounted on the AH-64E? Because it seems to block everything just as much.


better?

86bfe33cae67e517bbaa757943f3ea82028f9a30_2_1000x562

1 Like

Depends on which system is intended to be mounted(let alone what is modeled), there are 3 known configurations (of the AAQ-24(V)) that have been mounted to the AH-64, and a further one (AAQ-45) that is somewhat prospective.

Ingame one.

The mounting of the AH-64E, and the location of the Mi-28NM