I do agree, they should be fixed, if that’s how they preform irl, then give them their irl standards. If you look at any post I have ever made, it’s advocating for irl performance.
Double standards go both ways. Russia was the last to get real FnF capability, and had the auto loader model a year before turret baskets came in. So it’s a two way street, let’s be logical and not illogical.
It’s really annoying though how you, and others paint me. Somehow you’ve all come to believe my pfp immediately means all users with it are biased af.
I’m biased af in favor of realism.
We are. The annoying thing is that to match the double standards for Russia pound for pound you need to pull examples from 4-5 different tech trees. Double standards are common, one tree getting them consistently is not.
It’s not really your pfp, it’s that you will compile the wildest theory for why Russia is not getting preferential treatment instead of just admitting that they do
And before that nobody had their autoloaders modelled, giving Russia and JP/FR to a small degree an artificial advantage for literally almost a half decade.
Besides, we are talking about missile lofting profiles here. The Hellfire incorrect lofting situation is by far the longest standing one, and it is yet to be fixed, and all FnF missiles have inherited its awful lofting profile.
Gaijin certainly has had the time and more than enough generosity and help from the community to point out the errors in the flight characteristics of all these missiles. But why didn’t they fix them? They probably didn’t deem it necessary, but if that’s the case, then why did LMUR not follow the same policy?
You all do the same thing. Nothing wrong in a comparison. It only adds to a debate, it doesn’t take away.
Really…? Dude… USA gets preferential treatment more than anyone.
First Nation to get ARH / great radars
Nations with all the best heavies, that are under br’d
Lots of tanks under br’d compared to their counterparts, example Bradley vs BMP-2
Fake 5.0 sec reloads.
Do I need to keep naming examples of how other nations get preferential treatment?
It’s not like the ammo wasn’t model, it’s always been the definitive thing to shoot in tseries, cmon dude, don’t play that card. I could understand that over things like the Type 90s and Leclerc which had blow out panels.
Again, I agree they should fix them, spikes are very bad most of the time. And once they are fixed, I’d love for them to fix the Vikhir penetration, setting it back to 1000 instead of the 800mm is was reduced to, to “make it fair for vehicles firing Hellfires” and yes that was said in a de blog years ago. Like 8-10 months post KA-50 launch
Lastly, they have had the time to fix the MZ loader, with hundreds of people posting documents to support a 6.0 sec load time… but they never added it, and it’s only rumored to be coming
Dude I’ve dropped a bunch of nukes in it, as well as my friends have. Great tank. 8.7 worthy with ease, it’s direct competitor the BMP-2 is 8.7
Hell people said the cv9030 (the first one) was really bad for 9.3 also dropped a nuke in my first game in it, super survivable, good gun, decent mobility even when stock.
The US often gets new mechanics as the first that is true.
But how many countries get a fake AGM for their CAS? How many get dubious engine missile racks for their top tier jet? How many get a lofting heli AGM? How many get their internal modules added without functionality, because it would be unfair if only they got them? How many get an LDIRCM thats mounted on the bottom of the Heli but can affect ammo over the heli?
38MT,s existence is yet to be proven, and its use on any of the platforms in game is absolutely fake
really? because how did they know that when it was added with missiles, and a platform that gets the extra pylons has the second best missiles in the game
because they should have at least made JAGM loft, but no, its not a russian missile so it doesnt loft
wtf are you on
MI28mn had LDIRCM for a whole update before 64E was added