Yeah, I don’t know about that, considering that the average player probably has something like 50 to 40% efficiency (whatever that means), I say we are doing pretty good.
Speaking of the Mi-28 problem, here is this wonderful gem.
PARS can’t even do top attack when it should be 45° angle, devs can do it with LMUR why can’t Western ordinance be treated the same?.
It was rear aspect. For the iglas.
Idk which helo is really better yet. I will soon test them. I’m half way done researching the AH-1Z
I remember a time when pars was the LMUR of the sky.
We are talking about LMUR and why it suddenly became acceptable for top-attack weapons to be a thing all of a sudden, while all the other Western FnF missiles are still artificially nerfed. You keep deflecting by bringing up whataboutism to avoid answering the question.
I was just making a statement. Don’t put words in my mouth.
You’d actually find I agree with you, but as per usual, due to my pfp, I am painted as villain purely based on the fact I like atomic heart…
My estimation is old code vs new code for weapon systems. JAGM is likely using old Hellfire code mixed with IR seeking code. Meanwhile LMUR is likely new code since it’s a totally new AGM.
So the Chinese agm, spike and pars are all just old code then and it’s a complete coincidence that only the lmur is correct?
Nice! Following me into other threads now?
So would you agree that: Hellfire, JAGM, Spike, Spike ER, and PARS should have their lofting profiles adjusted so that they do not behave like a sea skimming missile and more like a real fire and forget missile should work in real life, by approaching the target from above and at an angle?
I hope you realize the massive injustice and double standards of Gaijin when it comes to anything Russian. The fact that LMUR got its correct attack trajectory ON DAY ONE just adds insult to injury. Gaijin is just making a mockery out of the player base by showing they in fact CAN code top attack weapons in the game.
Oh so now you’re calling me crap like the other insults you were spewing in the other thread. So moving goalposts & vulgarity. Real classy there
Im calling your comments Crap, not you.
And I did never move a single goalpost
I do agree, they should be fixed, if that’s how they preform irl, then give them their irl standards. If you look at any post I have ever made, it’s advocating for irl performance.
Double standards go both ways. Russia was the last to get real FnF capability, and had the auto loader model a year before turret baskets came in. So it’s a two way street, let’s be logical and not illogical.
It’s really annoying though how you, and others paint me. Somehow you’ve all come to believe my pfp immediately means all users with it are biased af.
I’m biased af in favor of realism.
We are. The annoying thing is that to match the double standards for Russia pound for pound you need to pull examples from 4-5 different tech trees. Double standards are common, one tree getting them consistently is not.
It’s not really your pfp, it’s that you will compile the wildest theory for why Russia is not getting preferential treatment instead of just admitting that they do
And before that nobody had their autoloaders modelled, giving Russia and JP/FR to a small degree an artificial advantage for literally almost a half decade.
Besides, we are talking about missile lofting profiles here. The Hellfire incorrect lofting situation is by far the longest standing one, and it is yet to be fixed, and all FnF missiles have inherited its awful lofting profile.
Gaijin certainly has had the time and more than enough generosity and help from the community to point out the errors in the flight characteristics of all these missiles. But why didn’t they fix them? They probably didn’t deem it necessary, but if that’s the case, then why did LMUR not follow the same policy?
I see.
You all do the same thing. Nothing wrong in a comparison. It only adds to a debate, it doesn’t take away.
Really…? Dude… USA gets preferential treatment more than anyone.
First Nation to get ARH / great radars
Nations with all the best heavies, that are under br’d
Lots of tanks under br’d compared to their counterparts, example Bradley vs BMP-2
Fake 5.0 sec reloads.
Do I need to keep naming examples of how other nations get preferential treatment?
It’s not like the ammo wasn’t model, it’s always been the definitive thing to shoot in tseries, cmon dude, don’t play that card. I could understand that over things like the Type 90s and Leclerc which had blow out panels.
Again, I agree they should fix them, spikes are very bad most of the time. And once they are fixed, I’d love for them to fix the Vikhir penetration, setting it back to 1000 instead of the 800mm is was reduced to, to “make it fair for vehicles firing Hellfires” and yes that was said in a de blog years ago. Like 8-10 months post KA-50 launch
Lastly, they have had the time to fix the MZ loader, with hundreds of people posting documents to support a 6.0 sec load time… but they never added it, and it’s only rumored to be coming
are you really trying to say bradly is under BR’d?
if so you clearly have never played it
Dude I’ve dropped a bunch of nukes in it, as well as my friends have. Great tank. 8.7 worthy with ease, it’s direct competitor the BMP-2 is 8.7
Hell people said the cv9030 (the first one) was really bad for 9.3 also dropped a nuke in my first game in it, super survivable, good gun, decent mobility even when stock.
the BMP is a higher br because its gun is more effective, and its ATGM is much more responsive and easier to aim
The US often gets new mechanics as the first that is true.
But how many countries get a fake AGM for their CAS? How many get dubious engine missile racks for their top tier jet? How many get a lofting heli AGM? How many get their internal modules added without functionality, because it would be unfair if only they got them? How many get an LDIRCM thats mounted on the bottom of the Heli but can affect ammo over the heli?
