It looks similar to the one in the game.
You can put videos like the first one in one place (a**) for yourself.
It’s good that the game has server replay (where there is no desynchronization) and sensor view, where I can watch and test myself, both when shooting from the ground and from the air.
Go and test them in sensor view then, you’ll reach the same conclusion we all have reached, that their angle of attack and lofting vector is way too low
2 Likes
Then do that my guy. No need to be rude just because you didnt like every source provided so far.
3 Likes
What are the sources?
@T4T this diagram should help explain where the SPIKEs should be hitting, and that is compounded by the test videos (which you requested btw) that I linked
Nice paint skills btw.
Call me crazy, but i think our fellow forum user has been baiting us, continued denial of facts and evidence + snarky comments, pretty telling that he’s obtuse to the situation
5 Likes
This guy is 100% Trolling / Ragebaiting, I woulndt respond to him anymore, you have provided him with ample evidence if he was truely open to conversation.
6 Likes
@TheLuckyShot
You guys are probably right. Its so frustrating that its impossible to have a proper good faith discussion with russia players in this forum.
3 Likes
But you can’t be 100% sure.
Well its either that or youre a bit dense. Your choice
1 Like
Really is starting to seem that way, I haven’t had a constructive conversation with anyone defending the KH-38MT/Mi-28NM so far, and the hypothesis there is that they simply want their favourite toys to remain OP 🤔
4 Likes
I mean thats kinda normal in a PVP game so i understand that. But what annoys me is how completely unable they are to argue in good faith. Its just whataboutism, purposefully misunderstanding arguments and statshaming with these people.
Its understandable to be fair, nato had its day too back in the day with the PARS when they were first added (later nerfed into the ground), but the loft thing is what is pissing me off most about this entire situation, it has been an issue way longer than the LMURs even exist. But so far the LMUR is the only missile with its correct flight profile. Just worried gaijin wont do shit, since the 38-MTs are still ridiculous imo and this would be a similar situation.
Well they fit into the catergory of typical ‘midwittery’, using trolling, logical fallacies and other generally unproductive and bad faith debating methods in order to undermine the arguments and suggestions of reasonable players
1 Like
But the US gets 16. It’s balanced out
Ok yea that’s fair.
Ok that’s also fair. I support modeling other MBTs correctly as well. But I don’t think Russian tanks should be nerfed as they’re not that good in top tier. Even if they are modelled rather correctly.
2S38 is mediocre. And I don’t think they “tried” to make it better.
Ok fair.
They do have proof.
Pretty sure the japanese one can function without a radar too. Anyways the missile is currently in service and it is in Ukraine.
I don’t play naval so I can’t say anything.
But what you’re talking about is all high to top tier Russia. Russia is mediocre at medium to low tiers. I would say that Russia is like a hamburger. You get shit in between and nice things on top. However when people see that they think that you’ve always had the nice things
Russia barely gets good things in top tier too. They have mediocre tanks and only the CAS part is really good