Without replay it could be screenshot from custom game
1 Like
Except it’s not and there’s zero reason to assume that.
You people are incredibly ridiculous.
Just search the guy’s server replays if it’s that important.
1 Like
You call me ridiculous and ask me to prove YOUR point that i hypothetically do not support.
Why so ? It’s just a screenshot we can assume anything.
1 Like
Why should he have to root around to prove a point, one he’s already evidenced with a screenshot, when the resources he’s suggested to look for are publicly available and pretty accessible.
Some people need to stop demanding that everything is handed to them on a plate, and go and perform the bare minimum level of research
1 Like
The big problem with Mi28nm is the LMUR, yeah, the other two helis with LDIRCM (a little bit better on those) and fnf missiles are faster and turn better, but it is the same problem with kh38, the nation that already had the most effective A2G missile recieved the best fnf missile for a heli, it has the best speed, the best flight path and the best explosive mass.
Yeah yeah, “but it only has 8 while the other ones has 16” well, a direct hit is basically a kill and we go back again to the “but EF can carry more brimstones” and so on, and so on…
Yeah, that helicopter is immune (kinda) to IR missiles and gaijin modeled LDIRCM so bad than targeting pods can´t lock those helis when every other helicopter can be locked as always.
Dudes, I really don´t know how or why you still denying the bias.
4 Likes
Lmao I give everything on a plate and people still demand more. Get over it.
It’s not even bias. NATO has been getting better things than Russia for a very long time
1 Like
Im playing it right now after unlocking it and honestly, its a piece of shit. The radar is too slow to update, the TELARs are schizophrenic and the missiles fail most of the time at dealing with planes flying low. Its a mixed bag.
Also turns out ingame stats count TELARs as the entire system, i was wondering why i had more deaths in the BUK on my stat card than the matches ive played despite the fact that i have had 0 backups for the thing.
It can however sometimes do mindboggling things like this.
2 Likes
Well its not Gaijins fault that the USSR tree is slowly but surely running out of top of the line stuff to match NATO vehicles. They are already doing their best with gimping non russian equipment as much as possible with plausible deniability
1 Like
What do Russians have that is the best in the top br game that we can call Russian bias?
Best a2g misailes? Yes
Best overall CAS? No
Best mbt? No
Best lt? No
Best a2a arh missiles? No
Best a2a sahr missiles? Yes
Best aoa dogfighter? No
Best spaa? No
Best saclos spa? Yes
I forgot something else, I’ll write it down when I remember.
1 Like
How many times do we have to say this. Bias is not being the best, its getting preferential treatment compared to others. And Russia 100% does.
Best A2G missile thats also the only one that correctly lofts.
Best CAS propped up by a missile with so flimsy sources that it would never be added for any other tree.
Absolutely not the best MBTs but the only ones that are modeled accurately without any artificial nerfs
Not the best light tank but they really tried with the 2S38
A2A missiles is the only part where russia gets screwed over, because Gaijin seems to be incapable of correctly modeling the R77s drag but its not like everyone else is correctly modeled
Thats easily rectified however by just giving the SU30SM the biggest amount of missiles without proof
Maybe not the best SPAA but again with a missile thats barely in service and its the only SPAA that can function without its radar vehicle
Also, giga made up insanely unbalanced top tier ship. Releasing it balanced would have been no problem but i guess Gaijin wanted the USSR to rule the waves
Feel free to tell me where im wrong and give some counterexamples
I haven’t looked at the statistics, but maybe it’s just the most popular nation in the game? From a business perspective, I would do the same.
What about the spikes? (This is a question, not an objection.)
KH38MT? If they remove it, I would be all for it. ML is completely enough. But as I said, if the Russian nation is the most popular, they won’t remove it. After all, gaijin is a business.
Maybe it’s just that the documentation on the characteristics of Russian tanks is more easily accessible.
No comments
I can’t even imagine how many missiles it must have.
I agree here, for the price of one spa, you get two.
No idea
2 Likes
I love this “bias is what i choose” and starts cherry picking what he want’s and spraying it with misconceptions that he liked.
1 Like
Look up the definition of bias
I invite you to comment where ive made a misconception and those things are not cherry picked they are a direct answer to the points T4T made. I know reading is hard but maybe make a bit of effort before commenting.
1 Like
I dont disagree here but that would still be bias, wouldnt it?
Similar angle to PARS, even the ground launched ones.
Still doesnt really excuse its addition in the first place
That might be partially true but even if there are sources available (swedish Leo2 document) Gaijin still doesnt correctly implement the values and thats also no excuse for things like decade old ammo and stuff like turret baskets/stabilizer restrictions
Im pretty sure that no one so far has shown the SU30SM with the missile load it has in game
I know people dont care for naval but the way Soyuz got added is really ridiculous
I meant, is the trajectory in the game modeled correctly or not? Because quite often it hits the roof directly.
Utterly horrendous, this is from a match earlier today
(Video uploaded in 2 parts to reduce file size)
4 Likes
inclination or prejudice for or against one person or group, especially in a way considered to be unfair.
Mmmm interesting a lot of tech trees had ships that never sailed but only soviet are problem. Being blasted by American destroyers, Scharnhorst or anything else wasn’t the problem it started being a problem when Soviet started blasting there is bias but not from devs. 2S38 is horryfing ? Can anyone remember the AGS ? That thing could be considered bias well only if it was on Soviet tree ofc.
1 Like
Because a large proportion of soviet high tier ships (which are supposedly very problematic according to naval players) either were only laid down, or simply proposed.
1 Like
Question was about loft.