Are USSR mains incapable of reading and basic stat comprehension or what on earth is going on here
H_ngma_: The number of battles played shows which helicopter is the best, not the K/D!!!
Translated.
2 Likes
What i read is: MI28NM existed before the Lmur for a long time, it was played occasionally by some, but AH64E appeared, and with fewer games played that the MI28NM has a better K/D in a very short time.
If anything, it shows that AH64E is far better, it is less used but in this short time it got an outstanding result by it’s pilots, meanwhile MI28NM is being played a lot since the Lmurs were added, and is still in third place of the “meta helis”, the data speaks for itself
1 Like
Thats a very interesting interpretation of that data.
What it actually shows is that the post LMUR MI28 is good enough to pull all games made with it pre update (1st-23rd) to a similar performance as the 64E that released with new AGMs. Whether its better or worse will be shown in the october data.
Uhm no?
it’s not useless it just underperforms like post pen damage (pretty much all FnF that not LMUR) and loft tejectory fix these two it’ll become great missile.
1 Like
Stop trying to nerf Russia. Skill issue
Post pen damage maybe, maybe not… on the trajectory, yeah it need fixing, the sudden “leveling” just before impact, inherited from the AGM-114, is odd to put it mildly.
Instead of nerfing it you should get gaijin to introduce similar missiles to all tech trees instead
I don’t understand what you mean.
Are you trying to say that mi28 was in 6th place in terms of K/D according to the August stats?
I mean not just missile any shaped charge post pen damage in this game kinda lackluster except for some few. (like recoilless gun that thing was miracle in term of post pen for a shaped charge)
It may be something with volumetric or the spageti code of tandem warheads… I’ve seen a bug report on a wrong diameter of the missile, but I doub it will make much difference
1 Like
No im trying to say that the MI28 (and the Z10) statistically shows a similar september performace level compared to the 64E despite being played before the LMUR was even added. That means that either the MI28 was that good before the LMUR got added (which doesnt make sense since its august stats are way worse) or that its good enough with the LMUR that it evens out all games made before the update so it arrives at a similar performance to the 64E averaged over the entire month.
Ofc its also possible that no one played the MI28 before the 23rd of september and all games we see are post update but that sounds lika bit of a stretch especially with a 350000 game gap
Now I understand. You meant to say that the statistics for September mi28 are unified, both for that month when mi28 did not have lmur, and after that when they gave him them. Well, next month could be completely different. And when all USA mains unlock 64E, his stats will drop to the lowest level. And it’s definitely not because the helicopter is bad :D
1 Like
I think a good chunk of SPAA players would disagree with you there xD
Gaijin emphasizes historical accuracy and gameplay balance for vehicles across different tech trees.
When you report issues with gameplay imbalance, they justify it as a necessity for historical authenticity.
When you point out a lack of historical accuracy, they cite gameplay balance as the reason.
And of course, the standards vary depending on the faction.
This thing needs to go to 13.0. It should not see anything 11.7 and lower
2 Likes
Chinese stats will go up over time, russia’s will stagnate and america’s will drop.
That’s the widely observed trend, and I bet it’ll be the same for these helis
5 Likes
yes, it shows a better K/D but MI28 and Z10 stats are averaged over the whole month and include lots of games and deaths before it had fire and forget missiles, while that is not the case for ah64e
2 Likes
Well i guess that probably why nobody ever wins against such incompetent.