So USA one is best?
The mentality that “USSR is strong” just develops people’s mind to think that, resulting in bad performance players. Not that the Mi-28NM stats are bad when compared to AH-64E, is actually a very thin margin, but the difference is clear.
Not necessarily. Remember the update released on september 23rd so the MI28NM had most of its september games without LMUR since its not a new vehicle while the 64E released with the new AGMs. Which also explains why the 2 have a 350,000 game difference
1 Like
You wanna know what really pisses me off in the LMUR? That thing has actual loft and trajectory.
Just so you get the picture. When you fire a Hellfire, or the new JAGM, the game makes it loft a bit (fly up to pick up inertial speed and face less air resistance) and aims the missile at the center of mass of the vehicle you fired. So for example, if you fired on an Abrams, that missile will be aiming for the turret ring or the center of mass of the hull.
When you fire the LMUR, it shoots straight up, and aims for the roof of the vehicle you fired, meaning it has it’s IRL flight path, and not the bs center of mass shit the hellfire has… Pretty fun, right? But god forbid the Hellfire do that or having FnF brimstones…
6 Likes
So Ah-64E is the best… nice :)
read.
1 Like
regardless… better K/D…
Ok great so you can understand pictures, now do the next step and understand what i wrote above
We really should be measuring efficiency in number of kills per quantity of missiles fired (eg 2 kills per 5 launches or 4 kills for 4 launches, etc)
Heli K/Ds are irrelevant in the ‘launch n land’ meta
So why did you post the stats with a caption “Alright people discussion is over” if you think they dont represent the reality???
You shoot yourself in the foot fist by posting the stats and again by calling them missleading…
1 Like
if you are ignoring anything about vehicle because you are stats cultish then yes it better.
“when the facts are again me… too bad for the facst…”
1 Like
“Heli K/Ds are irrelevant in the ‘launch n land’ meta”
Oh my, I wonder what other excuse they’ll come up with to avoid admitting that the Mi-28 is still in last place out of the three new helicopters.
2 Likes
No. I dont ignor that LMUR is better missile. But I’m not in the opinion that AGM-179 is as useless as most of the “muCh rusSiaN biAs” crowd claim it to be… and the AH-64E is a competative if not the best heli in the top tier
1 Like
So for people that use their brain for like 2 seconds the stats are actually not misleading. They show pretty well that all 3 helis perform a lot better than their counterparts and the MI and Z10 specifically are very interesting, because their stats are similar to the 64E despite them being without the new AGMs for 3/4 of september
1 Like
Then dont show the stats… again you failed twice… and you’re keep failing, regardless of you mental gymastics
do also consider how easy it is to intercept 8x lmurs vs 16x slightly faster jagm-mr ?. vs SAMs 12-16 missiles ?.
Im actually baffled that someone like you is able to use a computer
Well well… who could have guessed?.
“Russian Bias” talks all around despite people like myself saying the AH 64E and Z10ME had better mobility and DIRCM (so better survivability) than the MI-28NM, and the missiles despite being a bit less powerful than Lmur still had a consistant Kill to Shot ratio, now stats speak the truth to all to see.
1 Like
Buk right now and the other only fox 3 Anti-airs are the worst competing ones, even the swedish Griraffe is more reliable than a BUK, my own experience as cas player