4 actually, and not enough time to intercept the whole barrage
lmao, as if thats a gotcha of some sort
i have to spawn CAP to kill him… CAP which costs me more…
this guy literally capped a point in a light and got in an untouchable heli with infinite missile refills
he killed my entire team all by himself because no spaa can kill him, he shot down an a-10 going to gun him down because helis get invulnerability after landing and rearming
this is SO FUN, so FUN
I’m basing my claims on data that’s collected from thousands of players and their experiences. You not seeing this is a you problem.
I’m not talking about the modelling issues, just tried to say that claiming PARS and UHT are some useless garbage with piss poor damage is a straight up lie.
Either give us more powercreep or give us more compression.
You basically had three options to pick from and you picked two wrong ones. Instead of doing any of those you mentioned, how about we get 13.0 BR for helicopters ?
Data that
A. is incomplete since we dont have the new heli data yet
B. youre not even interpreting correctly. The UHT is performing pretty much the same as all other 12.3 helis and barely edges out the non FnF MI28 in KD while performing a lot worse than the Z10ME.
So your “databased claims” are completely useless in a discussion about the LMUR MI28NM.
but but stats said Vikhr more effective that PARS due to higher K/D so Vikhr better than PARS according to stats
and PARS FnF be in the game for six years
stats tell the truth stats have tell no lie stats tell everything right?
im expecting some rigorous data collection methods then, rather than “ive looked at what 4 people have written and i agree with it” or similar.
Ive played UHT extensively, im playing Mi28NM right now a lot (and i played it before LMURs) and generally i like flying helis. So atleast i have some perspective to go off of.
Thats why its so annoying to argue with people on many things about CAS, SPAAs or similar when they themselves either dont have it or go off of what people write on forums/reddit or cherry picked youtube videos. Even fighting against something to understand its measure is better than going off of purely ragebait and cope posts.
This isnt aimed at you personally, but rather a general observation.
Raising the BR cap for helis doesn’t do anything to ammend the imbalance between top tier helis, and poor performance of certain FnF weapon systems.
In an ideal world, PARS and SPIKES will be buffed, and helis are raised to 13.0, but my main concern is that helis are balanced by their weaponry first, and statistically later
Tanks haven’t changed so it’s more than fine to use that data to figure out if something can kill those tanks or not.
I’m not the one claiming UHT is some mega uber OP vehicle with missiles of the same caliber. I was just responding to people stating it’s shit, which it clearly isn’t.
Vehicle of a major nation performing worse than the vehicle of a minor nation, who could’ve guessed.
Heavily debatable in comparison with the new powercreep slop
Statshark did the data collection for me already.
The statshark stats you showed bear no relevance to your argument, the UHT has roughly equivalent stats, and worse in some cases to it’s counterparts, and overall it’s grossly mediocre
Yes it does do something as being at 13.0 is a clear indication something is better than a vehicle at 12.3 for example. This would be even more noticeable if tanks climbed past 12.0 already as well.
Then move the powercreep slop up, what you’ve suggested makes no sense and is detrimental to the game.
They literally prove UHT isn’t some trash ass helicopter with trash ass missiles that do nothing but damage the tracks and optics. It doesn’t take much to refute a baseless claim on this forum.
The ‘baseless’ claim that’s widely regarded to be legitimate, and has been the case for years now, vs the opinion of a known russian shill, you can spout the reddit-style stat dribble but your stated ‘statshark numbers’ just show that it’s bang average, and that goes to back the calls to buff the PARS, more than reasonable imo
Depends on the comparison. Compared to an Alouette its not, compared to a MI28NM it might be.
The Z10 also has 120000 games in august its not some obscure niche. And seeing that an FnF capable helicopter with the at that point most capable SPAA at its back is barely outperforming a guided missile MI28NM and gets outperformed by a Z10 doesnt strike you as odd?
Materially, putting the Mi-28NM up to 12.7 from 12.3, does absolutely nothing to help the UHT (and other similar mediocre helis), since you are still going to be uptiered to fight the NM as long as it’s meta, whereas buffing the PARS first, observing how the UHT performs afterwards and then moving it up is more reasonable, and benefits everyone besides people abusing the meta
I don’t really know about you guys but i find rolands and other missiles guided with ur mouse very effective against helis as long as you don’t lock them with radar.
Well yeah, anything decently quick and SACLOS is great against all top tier helis, provided they are oblivious to their MAWs.
It’s why the Pantsir was so dominant for so long, hard to spot and fast missiles gives minimal time to react for the heli.
Things like DCIRM were made to directly counter MANPADS and other missile systems. The Apachee uses CIRCM and CIRCM – Common Infrared Countermeasures | Northrop Grumman
but stats tell me that KA 52 better than Tiger UHT because it had more K/D so vikhr must be better than PARS since it had higher K/D stat don’t lie remember? stat is god of truth for you why you don’t accept it
when your god telling you this let ignore other thing about vehicle and let decide only by looking stats oh yeah.
