Their response to the review bombings was days after the special form was open.
Steam lumps reviews into monthly slots, so the fact that review bombing started on the afternoon of May 18th for me, morning of the 19th for Europe. Not the 16th. The Special Form was a response to the International & Russian forums blowing up.
The Special Form was opened prior to 06:30 on the 18th of May:
I think he’s trying to say that the people on Russian forums are mostly shills, oddly enough from what I observed the Chinese forum is quite the opposite (people regularly cursing BV*D the current snail manager, and Anton Yudintsev before he retired)
it’s cheap because with all vehicles unlocked, do you think that someone will pay ? well yes, just a couple of players for the couple of nice vehicles, also some will buy op ones. The no cheap mmo’s get his money from skins and stuff to make battle more enjoyable, WT is pay to skip
without ty90 and extreme grind, would someone buy the z19 ???
I guess that immediate success has different mean depending on people
Their opinions towards gaijin are far more negative than the ones allowed to be expressed on r/warthunder or here, insults such as “BVVD NMSL” are regularly chanted. fortunately despite how widespread censorship occurs on chinese social medias especially “tieba” which is essentially our reddit, the cyber police doesn’t censor stuff like this. And yes it’s literally managed by the police department, they ban far more accounts than civilian moderators
I really appreciate this post. I understand many of the issues that you are addressing. Well thought out. As to the game economy though, I’ve found this game to be far more generous than other games I’ve played.
What are you on about? Inverse only applies to conditionals. You did not make a conditional. You made a full statement.
Your statement was not “If you are a nationalist, you like your own nations stuff.”
It was “Nationalists like their own nations stuff.” That is a “declarative” (sentence).
Inverses (In logic) only apply to conditionals.
Inverse in conditionals is a whole other story when you take actual grammar into account
At least read the Wikipedia article you are citing, or at least the first sentence of it:
So An american who only likes American vehicles can be a nationalist or not.
But an american who likes only russian vehicles can not be an american nationalist?
So what classifies a nationalist in this case, if his likes or dislikes are of 0 relevance. I mean you seem to believe that nationality and likes are in correlation with nationalism. It was not me who made such a statement
Imho you should be more concerned about your civil rights in Western democracies whilst using social media…just read this and think about Freedom of Expression; or the recent case of the guy posting the famous Hillary C. meme…
It is imho even harder to claim that something doesn’t exist without having full insight in all relevant and determinative parameters. From a neutral perspective some of these claims regarding Russia bias add quite convincing circumstantial evidence that those claims were not made by guys with tin foil hats.
Thank you very much for your insights how the RU forum and devs are connected.
Seeing this thread as a whole it looks like all you need to initiate changes is access to the RU forum, 70+ people with >30k battles and the ability to read and write in Cyrillic letters.
Finding these 70+ guys looks much more effective than writing thousands of posts/bug reports/suggestions to improve the game.
There are three main claims thrown around to prove Russian bias:
Ammo doesn’t explode
Fuel tanks eating whole rounds
Tanks being incorrectly depicted
All of those three points are valid for plenty of nations that aren’t Russia, and are also observable across several (if not all) tiers in the game.
This makes me to believe, instead of bias, that Gaijin is simply unable to properly code that many things to work together, and it’s obvious many bugs will be really hard to properly solve in such an extensive game.
Reading the headlines won’t make you smarter dude. The whole text is relevant - so the reports of actual arrests with corresponding evidence is the main point of this link - and not the headline.
Source for your claim?
No offense, but if an adult thinks he could vote via a text message he is simply proving that Idiocracy was a documentary and not science fiction.
Imho you proved nothing else that there is gap between superficial reading and actually understanding the content and context.
Believing in things that can’t be proven is individual freedom. To deny deviating claims / opinions because they can’t prove their views is limiting the freedom of others.
This is my point.
There isn’t a single speck of evidence bias exists but yet people are parroting same things, while being totally certain their points are 100% correct.
Speaking about any sort of bias like it’s a done deal (which was done by a poster I replied to) is very foolish to say the least.
