The Japanese Ho-Ri SPG project – full technical and historical analysis (spreadsheet)

No such thing as too small for a rangefinder. As long as there is any sort of parallax between the 2 optic ports, then it can be used as a stereoscopic rangefinder.
image

You get much more accurate readings the farther apart the 2 are, which is why you typically get those massive ones on tanks that don’t have to worry about weight, but when space is an issue, then you can go for a smaller system than none at all. The Conqueror also mounts it’s rangefinder in the cupola rather than spanning the whole turret.
image

3 Likes

Conqueror is a bad example and is from the mid-50’s, which is why I neglected to add it. We’re talking about a vehicle from 1945. The Conqueror also has a coincidence rangefinder, not stereoscopic which is why it’s much smaller.

The problem with smaller stereoscopic rangefinders is that the smaller they are the less accurate they are.

image
Stereoscopic is really something you want as large as possible to get the most accuracy for your weapons effective range, here it is compared to other systems.

1 Like

smallest range finder is mark 01 human eyeball.
Imagine if we GMO humans with Hammerhead shark we wont need a range finder anymore!

Its a joke

solution to 19th century gunfire accuracy issues!