Cool story, but have you found any sources to back up your claims or are you still in the “my source is that I made it the fuck up” phase?
Yep.
Normally argument pattern is he will ask for a source and will dispute it with ChatGPT even if it directly proves him wrong. He ended up running Su-27 manual in ChatGPT to try to prove that the turn rate chart is for 50% internal fuel and the. Didn’t even bother reading it when it actually disagreed with him.
What are we even arguing about here, I’m looking through the last 100-200 posts and the discussion is about everything but the topic of the thread. I even found some guide for mouse and keyboard controls.
The iron dome meta is both unrealistic and a bad game design, so what possible reasons could you have to want to keep it in the game.
It’s obviously a bad game design, because the gameplay comes down to literally just clicking buttons and the player who has more missiles wins.
The fact that in real life intercepting fox 3s with your own fox 3s is not done instantly proves it’s unrealistic. In real life the only rule is to win and if it’s not done, then it’s probably not effective.
Intercepting missiles overall is not uncommon, but it’s mostly the case for ground-based air defense systems and even those aren’t 100% effective.
For me at least, I hardly see them on blue side when I’m playing. 90% of blue side players consist of the US.
1 Like