We get a lot of fully ai made posts on the forums as of late, and your formatting and the em-dash showed ai usage was present in your post. If you simply used it to translate that’s not a problem, but please ensure you’re not having the ai formulate your opinions/points for you.
2 Likes
Rather have the python 4 that its slightly better than R-73 but worse than AIM-9X/PYTHON-5.
And so the F-16I can justify such high BR and Kfir C.10 recieve its historical aam.
You mean the minor weight change?
They are no where close to the worst because F-18E/F, Su-30SM/MKM, etc are still not as good as the Gripen E.
I cannot support the addition of the IRIST, as it is likely to cause various issues; however, I do support the addition of the Derby. This is because the ability to equip missiles with different performance characteristics expands tactical options. In particular, the Derby’s high acceleration and maneuverability make it an effective countermeasure against approaching aircraft—such as the F-15GE or Su-30SM2—enabling more aggressive missile employment.
Please excuse any unnatural phrasing, as I am using Google Translate.
Something needs to be done to address the dominance of the MICA . I find it funny how France gets the MICA but Israel can’t get a single one of its better missiles.
because you know nothing about it or about the game.
This is literally a bot account lmao
1 Like
No reason to attack me personally. Do you honestly think the MICA currently isn’t the best in game?
i didnt attack you, i dont know you. and yess the mica is the most powerful misssile in the game and its unfair that its the only one that get its own seeker modeled.
but its about the other part. issrael cant get them, wanna know why ? i let you guess
I didn’t say Israel should get MICA. This is just a misunderstanding. Israel has better options than the 120C and Python 3. Every nation needs better missiles in game is what I am trying to say maybe with the exception of France.
i clearly undersstood this. but one nation shouldnt get into a new form of next gen missile and others dont, exemple dual pulse or better ir seeker misssile
All nations have options that could be pretty much balanced should they be implemented. They could implement the next gen for everyone at the same time instead of this staggered release schedule like there is now. I bet you could balance it better as a result.
They should give me the RB72, it can’t go on the Gripper but I just want it in game
they do but… the game doessnt.
we are playing mode where we do bvr at 40km.
how would you think a 60km like the 120d-3 or a meteor with 100km no escape zone would do to the game ?
yeah, dead. 1 sec after spawn they all launch.
IRIS-T
Derby-ER
PL-17
R-37
Meteor
AIM-174
I think this list is reasonable and probably easier to balance.
I think it would make people play better.
They are going to implement these eventually. Might as well be soon so we can learn how to counter them.
there is 2 imposter who are trying to fit the 200km range missile party. guess which one
The first Fox-3s were terrifying upon release but we figured out how to get around them. Players got better at the game.
As far as real life open source performance data there is none. Which means it could be adjusted for balancing due to a lack of data.
I mean you could say the same thing abt the POBIT, its missing the AIM9X and radar jamming. Along with the AIM260 being just now implemented to the fleet.
Oh and the ability to hard lock multiple targets with the radar.