OK I can respond again, oh and a big thank you to whomever reported my post. It wasn’t that bad they determined so yeah watch what you say in here for now on. 2 many snowflakes.
2 Likes
The forum is also in its worse state ever and reflects the game currently.
6 Likes
No it’s definitely not.
You really are up there with your mate Alvis Wisla in useless defenders of the indefensible. Are you the same person different accounts? What good do you think you are doing defending the lame maps and constant needless nerfing?
1 Like
Maps are fine and nerfs are generally tied to bug reports.
Yeah everybody loves those new featureless and cut off narrow maps. Do you even read this forum? You would make a fine politician living in denial.
6 Likes
The forums has always been full of people complaining. Thats generally the type of people who frequent them. As for being a politician that would be you. You certainly have a low enough IQ to be one.
Single cap maps always should have had narrower playable area, that only makes sense; I’ve wanted to see this happen for many years. It’s basically a bug fix.
Try having disagreements without throwing insults around.
1 Like
You are the only person I have seen on here who does not hate the narrow red line maps and most even leave as soon as they see one.
Try actually reading other people’s posts instead of just coming on here with your flat earth viewpoint.
3 Likes
Everything related with maps in this game is a mess. Even map rotation is completely destroyed and map desing for tanks is just trash.
10 Likes
Yes, it was sarcasm. Im quite sad of the small maps and ppl 70%-90% of team quitting game after 1-2min. But if its enemy team overruning with their premiums, then yeah gg
well… kinda need to make it a LOT more obvious its sarcasm… since its just plain text, and there is no body language, tone of voice, etc, to go off of
1 Like
Maps are the definition of not fine, there have been a “few” improvements here and there. European province and Poland is proof that they can make the maps feel more balanced and playable (if we force them to). But there is still a lot of work to do.
All the legacy maps shouldn’t be playable past 7.0 and a whole set of new maps for modern vehicles have to be made from the ground up, with existing big maps being the only exception. That, or fix the old maps to accommodate new play styles and modern vehicles. Adding more area behind spawn for top tier SPAA to move around is a good initiative for example.
2 Likes
That doesn’t work when the majority want to play them like it’s COD.
The game is in the worst state ever though
1 Like
Phly Dayli says what I think
5 Likes
His idea is trash though. A hard wall would destroy 7.0-7.7 as viable areas to play and straight up like 4-5 nations will become garbage overnight (even more than some of them already are)
5 Likes
The problem is not the idea, the problem is the player base, the human balance. Players don’t play or don’t want to play the tank in the role it was designed for.
No? The problem is he wants to butcher all vehicles that use non-conventional ammo, how would you make these viable at much higher BRs? This is just a single thing you can think of, there are dozens of issues
5 Likes
Every now and then a terrible minority opinion comes out.
That’s one of them.
No one wants historical battles, not even the very few people that claim they do.
“I play Maus, I want historical battles!”
So you want T-54s and M48s to face you exclusively… okay. And you can’t use your own M48 cause Germany wouldn’t have one historically speaking.
That or you can’t play the Maus cause it’s a prototype. Either or.
That and people have no interest in historical reenactments IRL, let alone in games.
There’s a reason DCS’s historical battles servers don’t exist/have no population.
There’s a reason Post Scriptum died so hard the devs renamed it which dug its grave further.
People want realism without strict, and almost always arguably stupid, rules.