Even better know i know you dont know that you talking about, you didnt do one match in it and think because you can fly passive and notch everything everybody can. also you think compress again instead of up bring one plane is better and on the last point there are countless videos even by big and good cc’s who show how big one a lot of maps the trees are. all youre points are simply invalid. If very good players on yt even say its overperforming i trust them more than a dude in a tornado lol no rlt a single plane shouldnt dictate how the battle is played in one br bracket this is not how balancing works. Another example too show you waht i mean, do you remember how fun it was in nightbattles to fight thermal vehicles only with NV? this is exactly the same problem here, no arh plane should fight no arh planes period
this rarely work against Fakour missles… Even going under 50meters doesnt make missle not to follow you… But I guess thats bug, but Im just too tired in reporting bugs to Gijin non stop, like so many bugs I would be embarrassed, and then they want us to be their testers and bug finders for FREE while overpricing game items and then after you buy it they nerf it…Just a joke thats be on for 10+ years…
So i am only allowed to comment on how to defend against an F14A if I have played it?
What a stupid answer. Why do I need to play the F14A to comment on how to defend against an F14A in what was one of the worst the turning aircraft in game with the weakest chaff in game.
Sounds like you have major skill issues
They can add AIM-9Ls.
Problem solved.
Yep, If they do it could quite happily move up. But this is Gaijin we are talking about. Simple solutions are rarely taken.
F14a doesnt need any new missles just put it to 13.7 it will be fine there
Honestly, I don’t have any issues for giving AIM-9Ls for historical side.
Gaijin modeled the F-14A Early from the 1977 SAC that didn’t mention about AIM-9Ls, but the U.S. Navy tested the AIM-9L with the F-14A at China Lake that same year. Also, as far as I know, AIM-9L can use same missile launcher with AIM-9G/H without any modifications.
I don’t remember its specific name :/
Also my J-8F that has PL-12.
They are really annoying when I play F-14s because A model doesn’t have decent RWR.
So… you are claiming the F-14A is equal to the F-15C and other 13.7 airfames
I have never done a match in the F-14. I dont really have much intention to either.
I am looking at it objectively and not going “Eeerrrr … Aim-54 OP must nerf”
Compared to many aircraft at its BR. The F-14A is kinda weak. Just being carried by 6x ARH missiles that can be defeated with half a brain cell. Just because it faces a wall of premium players that dont know the difference between flares and chaff doesnt make it OP.
Like I said. I’ve been playing the Sea Harrier FA2… and slapping F-14s out the sky with ease. THats my favourite ARH plane at the moment. A 9.7 airframe with a barely functional RWR or CMs but armed with 4x AMRAAM.
I could probably do the same in the Torando F3 with Skyflash if I could be bothered to jump into a match right now
I just got 3 kills in the FA2 flying at 10k ft against F-14s. You dont need to fly low if you fly smart
People were hugging the ground before the F-14As came to the game LMAO.
I don’t remember when people started that correctly but, iirc, they started that when Phantom FGR.2 was meta.
BTW, F-14s can go ways higher BR if Gaijin fixed tons of things such as IR signatures, dual plane.
AIM-54 is very far from historical and requires modeling correct loft profile and the dual planes that allow it to pull 25G.
For F-14A itself, flight model is fine as far as I know but, the very bad modeling of IR signatures has made it very difficult for aircraft with huge IR signatures like the F-14A and Harrier to dodge IR missiles.
Yep, Fixing IR sigs and you could probably place the Sea Harrier FRS1 at 11.7 without issue. But in its current state it really needs to be 11.0
in overall performance minus the Aim-54s. I dont think the F-14A would be that much higher than the Torando F3. If they ever fix BOL. Tornado F3 would probably be the superior of the 2 aircraft and their BR placement would be reversed. Its only the Aim-54 that is carrying the F-14 by the looks of things at its current BR
I just love fact same people are glazing F14 should nto be 13.7 but when its J35XS in question then its oke no RWS, dorito, garbage plane can compete with f14 or even f16.
Man this forum is complete let down its always same people just being toxic and making themselves stupid if they dont copy it from ChatGpt or Wiki…Instead of trying to make game better they just bitter they play this game for 10+ years and wanna everyone else who trys to play to not have fun
The universal consensus from anyone I have ever seen on the Forums, is that the J35XS should be 11.0. The only disagreement I’ve seen is 10.7 or 11.0.
Fine then. It can stay at 11.3 if you are going to act like that.
Either way, my point for the F-14A is to fix/add what is historically needed and then push it to a higher BR with the necessary modifications rather than unnecessarily pushing it to a higher BR.
Just like F-14A with AIM-9Ls, 25G load for AIM-54A.
We can get a late F-14A at some point with 9Ls TBH. Which would be a good in-between option, and a good foldered aircraft.
Suport my suggestion pls then :)
It would be awesome if we gets F-14A that can carry AIM-54C and decent RWR.
All you have to do is DM me, you dont need to embarrass yourself… just DM me and dont worry about anything else…