Can someone explain the reasoning behind this BR difference in Air RB?
The F-14A IRIAF sits at 13.7, while the Su-30MK2 AMV sits at 13.3 with access to six RVV-AE/R-77 active radar missiles, R-73Es and a helmet-mounted sight. Why is the Iranian Tomcat considered the more capable overall package?
I understand that the Fakour-90’s long-range capability is a major advantage, and that weapons have to count toward BR. But the aircraft carrying those missiles is still an F-14A. In my view, the underlying airframe and the rest of its equipment feel much closer to 13.0 than 13.7. Its AIM-9Ps and older supporting missile options make that especially noticeable once the opening BVR engagement is over.
There have also been discussions about Fakour-90 nerfs. Can anyone clarify exactly what changed in actual missile performance, rather than just the stat card? If its effectiveness has been reduced, has that been considered when reviewing the aircraft’s BR?
The R-77 and Fakour-90 fill different roles, so missile count alone doesn’t settle the comparison. But the Su-30 has dangerous medium-range ARH missiles and strong close-range weapons at a lower BR. Does the Fakour’s long-range advantage really outweigh that versatility enough to justify placing the IRIAF higher?
I’d like to see the IRIAF reviewed for 13.0–13.3 based on its current capabilities. What specifically makes it a 13.7 aircraft today, and why does the same balancing standard leave the Su-30MK2 AMV at 13.3?
