We already know that the devs love to add the export instead of fixing the current ones, but for the problem of the mig 35. The reason could be that Russia doesn’t have another 14.3 plane they can add some but it’ll be just a copy paste because all it’s left are the flankers from the '90s and that’s it. I mean apart from the different airframe engines. They are the same
I mean, the general consensus amongst the whining population regarding the PARS-3LR is that it is somehow real. Despite the fact that it was pretty much never seen again after failing its test runs in the US, due to a fail-prone seeker.
But hey, nobody cries about that, since it’s german.
I don’t hate the MiG 35 being added I really like the addition, and of course we are in the dreaded copy and paste zone now. With only the Su-35 and those variants being somewhat “unique” although giving the Su-30Sm2 the best pieces of the Su-35 will leave it feeling somewhat lacklustre.
PARS hasn’t destroyed a game mode for years bud, while sure it may be useless IRL Gaijin doesn’t use that when they add missiles. Kh-38 is still the strongest ground attack weapon in the game, despite having systems like JAGM and Brimstone (purposely held back for “balance”)
2 Likes
I mean there’s websites and press releases for the thing, so surely it’s more real than some stuff in War Thunder?
Guided Missiles | Diehl Defence
Feel free to add if i’m missing something.
released as 12.3
Not always, one can have 2 or 3 missiles comming from a slightly different aspect to be enough that one of them won’t be notched if you are trying to notch the other. Its often a skill issue, but not always.
Technically, it is possible to do a vertical notch against multiple in that case, but not always viable.
Sometimes I use the aim-120c to a decent effect by flying a bit to right side and then firing them when I think the enemy will be busy notching the first fox3 spam volley from the middle of the map and roughly fly into my missiles at the same time. You need to time it well though. Fakours would be even better for that
Well that is a matter of perspective.
PARS was quite the pain to deal with, for a rather long time, since no SPAA could really counter its fire and forget capabilities.
Not to mention that no other nation had an equivalent to the PARS.
And to be fair, with all these new SAM systems as well as all the new air to ground ordinance which other nations have received, I dont really see what’s so special abput the 38MT apart from it being a russian munition.
Btw, it is fair that brimstones should just become fire and forget.
No reason to withhold it now.
1 Like
Nice piece of paper.
Well, if this is enough “proof” of it actually working, then there isnt really much of a reason to cry about kh-38’s.
I mean, you said it was fake, yet there are pictures of them all over the internet
The issue with the kh-38MT is that its likely based on one of the ML variants.
It’s the fastest, longest range IR a2g missile in game currently.
4 Likes
There is 0 point trying to compare anything to the SU-30 premiums because they should be 13.7 at a minimum, but with the buffs, probably more like 14.0.
Best bet is to compare them to things like the F-16s, Tonka F3 Late, etc etc as that would actually give a more reasonable BR picture
1 Like
Huh?
1 Like
Quick question, are you from russia?
This post was flagged by the community and is temporarily hidden.
Because acting like PARS and the KH38MT are somehow on the same level of questionability regarding their existence is a level of cope usually only attainable by a certain group of players.
1 Like
radar has been mounted tested/used on multiple airframes already, like the eurofighter AESAs in game rignt now
MiG-35s has always had the upgraded RD-33MK engines
1 Like
And it was an exceedingly stupid point.
Imagine thinking that a missile that has: Multiple pictures of it, accessible manufacturer documents, testing reports, a literal video showing test fires from the relevant platform made by the manufacturer and was actually sold to the respective army is the same as a missile that has exactly none of that.
That is pretty much the definition of coping.
Please do explain why. Im really curious
Rightfully complaining about missing features and bad implementation is a problem now?
Imagine using words like that unironically.
Also how is pointing out an incredibly stupid point a self own here? Certain group of players can mean a lot of things.
1 Like
So far you have shown promotional materials.
Bright red missiles, a Radar and yes the engines are fine but not when they have emergency thrust modelled. Hence make believe engines.
Su-30Sm2 is the same none have been tested or operated with IRBIS and the upgraded engines.
Typhoon is operating with an AESA Radar Captor 0 for Kuwait. Turkey will also have Typhoons with an AESA. Its funny how Typhoon has to miss half of its systems for “balance”
DASS system modelled like a basic MAWS.
RWR unable to take the signal and use it for targeting.
Towed Radar decoys, Britecloud, BOL being useless. Stuck with missiles it never operated with 9M and 120C…
And Brimstone as the version 1 because more range speed and zero IOG drift would break the game.
Meanwhile Kh-38 is hittting moving targets ignoring smoke and dominating.
they dont?
not really, MIG-35 has atleast tested the Zhuk-AE proving compatibility unlike the current SM2 with Irbis and AL-41F1S
example being a MiG-35 with a two piece radome only found on AESA equipped models
never said i disagree with you on the typhoon missing features, thats is another issue
1 Like