7 Likes
You are at least 30.2% more effective at finding documents than I.
Nice.
1 Like
Mostly thanks to Flame, hes the archives explorer, truly based activities.
2 Likes
I want Brimstones to be as correct as possible.
Goth muted me cause I want Brimstones to be as correct as possible.
Goth only wants Russia to have good toys.
Goth claimed that British tech tree defenders are below him.
Typical and sad.
This is what Goth thinks of ANYONE that dares push for accurate British vehicles:
You do tend to piss a lot of us off for no reason and when we do make a valid point you shrug it and respond claiming we were in the wrong, If you didn’t want folks to insult you then you should seriously look into a mirror and accept when you’re in the wrong on something. Not referring to this case though. Anyway, that’s all I gotta say since Brimstones are not something I’m good at but going by what someone else said, unacceptable for them to not be accurate. Just don’t expect them to be a 1:1 accuracy it’s just not realistic nor feasible even DCS isn’t 100% accurate.
2 Likes
What are you talking about? I always acknowledge when I make mistakes.
And yeah, I was one that said it’d be unacceptable for them to not be accurate outside not having ARH cause ARH would be undefeatable.
And someone got mad that I dare want Brimstones to be accurate outside the ARH capability, and maybe insulting their precious Su-34.
make smoke block radar which is historical with multi spectrum smoke and dont allow LOAL problem solved
You have to prove all countries use it.
Dude… What are you saying? Firstly u said beam riding is worse now u are saying that beam riding is learning😑. My god like if pointing laser is not easy theres nothing to learn except making sure that missile isnt launched with too high angle
Beam riding is inferior to laser, that’s an objective reality.
The flaw of smoke is outweighed by the accuracy improvements and lower weight allowing for larger warheads and/or further range.
And yeah, in War Thunder you CAN do better because you just get more practice across more vehicles with beam riding than you do laser.
Learning laser guided weapons is different. It took me 3 hours just to learn how to ripple fire correctly and the mindset needed to understand when and how fast it should happen.
Well not worse in warthunder. Theres nothing different in laser guided weapons just point and shoot. The only difference is missile and platform and beamriding shooting trough smoke like brimstone would but nah its not balanced when other countries have it except russia
laser guided agms is not accurate when in comparison to beam riding agm, this is just false. In an open environment, laser guided agms won’t have an issue but when there’s foliage, ground clutter, etc, it is extremely difficult to hit a target. This is an objective truth that is acknowledged by the majority of the community
In addition laser guided agms are a lot more inaccurate at range. Take a look at the hellfire or the mokopa, their engine only last for a couple of seconds after than, it glides it’s way there. The farther it gets the more inaccurate it gets. Along with that comes with the time it takes for the agm to reach it’s target. The longer it is, the longer you will be in the open or seen.
At least the chinease agms can maintain it’s energy a lot longer because it has a sustainer engine. though it’s a bit slower
Warhead does matter but the accuracy matters a lot more. You rarely see a hellfire being launched from 5km because of how inaccurate it is as well as how risky it is. With that being said, Vikhr missiles can still oneshot and overpressure tanks but not to the same efficiency
firing in ripples only work when you’re safe to be in the air for longer periods of time. This is rare to see when spaa systems are very common in top tier.
Please address all my claims, because we had this dicussion last time and you didn’t even answer or attempt to counter my points:
1 Like
Accuracy is a bit worse with beam riding in War Thunder.
What’s strongest is just the mouse input that partially normalizes all weapon systems.
@HondaCivici
I’ve had zero accuracy issues with AGM-114 for the last 4 - 5 years, and Mokopa since whenever Rooivalk released.
Granted, I also trained for hours in test drives on laser guidance before purchase of the Peten.
At some point I just used laser weapons far more than any other guidance type.
I use LGBs in ground battles against Pantsir teams since Pantsir was introduced with perfect accuracy when I didn’t fat finger my bomb drop.
You may have a different experience and that’s okay.
@Serasvonvictoria
Please stop opposing improvements to Brimstone’s implementation. Brimstone being incorrect is not a lie no matter how much you claim otherwise.
Please stop attacking everyone that isn’t Russian.
@ShOt_MaCkEr
Brimstone needs to be fixed no matter what.
Britain needs its weapons to be as correct as possible.
I don’t know if you’re doing it intentionally or not, but scroll up for a while, it’s nothing but people getting mad and arguing with you. I know you have a lot of time, but you’re not a Jesus Christ himself to even think that you’re the only right one in this pool of sinners. Just come on.
3 Likes
@ShOt_MaCkEr
I don’t understand why people are mad at me for wanting Brimstone to be fixed… I really don’t.
This is just not true. Where ever you point your mouse the missile will follow it. That is in a sense what beam riding is. Laser guided agms don’t work like that. It needs a point lock for it to work, otherwise it will be using it’s IOG. The issue with that is point lock gets interfered with terrain features (trees, bushes, debris,etc) frequently. Again this is a known fact by the majority of the community.
laser guided bombs are different because you’ll be firing from an altitude where terrain features don’t become an issue. Those are two completely different things
Just out of curiosity what gamemode did you play when using helicopters?
2 Likes
Me: “Brimstones will be as OP as everything else if implemented correctly, even if we have to compromise on no ARH. They should be as correct as possible.”
Also me: “Su-34 due to being the heaviest afterburning jet coming to War Thunder will see an airframe slightly worse than Tornado IDSs due to its weight and design. Will it matter? Probably not.”
People: “BLOCK HIM!”
Me: “Why are they mad after I said basic facts every single British player said?”
@Serasvonvictoria
So because I like China and Britain I’m bad?
Wow… just wow… Well, keep thinking I’m biased in favor of China and Britain all you want I guess.
@HondaCivici
Ground RB, assault arcade, and heli PVE [heli PVE and assault arcade use player-detail vehicles with real damage models, good place to practice against MBTs with composite if you need it].
I played A LOT of assault arcade fragging T-80s, Challenger 2s, Abrams, Leopard 2s using Apache from various altitudes. Very good practice, translated well when I played ground RB with helicopters a lot.
And of course ground RB where I fragged more variety.
And heli PVE where there’s just a select few MBTs.
And that’s where the issue lies. You rarely play GRB from the looks of it. Yeah obviously you will say you have no issues with the hellfire. Saying that you practice only means something if you play GRB.
I don’t like stat peaking but it makes a lot more sense with the takes you have on helicopters
**for transparency, I filtered out low tier helicopters
1 Like
wait??? Harrier Gr7 out ranges pantsir are u serious??