The double standard when talking about the Brimstone's capabilities

Fair enough, but my other point still stands. if anyone brings up the stupid arh guidance or anything else just tell them to shut up.

Straight up, the only downside in this situation that the mavs have over the brimstones is the total carriage, but that does not matter at all if trying to use them will just get you killed.

Meanwhile from BVVD’s stream just now, groms can store target points and even engage targets behind the SU-34, its hilarious.

2 Likes

A fond thought for the Gr4 which does not have a modeled air-to-ground radar (for now I hope) while the Su34 has a perfectly modeled one which can be used to aim at targets (+ it seems that the Gromm1 can do a 180° in the air to hit targets behind the plane).

Brimstones should be implemented as accurately as possible.
Of course, active radar homing cannot be added as there is no counter, so that’s a compromise I must make.

Also I never once called for ARH to be implemented.

After the buffs Tornado IDS has a slightly superior airframe to that of Su-34, and blatantly superior to Su-24, so…
Are they DOA as well? Or just the British? Gonna defend Su-34 from your post’s own claim against Tornado?

Su-34 vs Tornado:

Spoiler

Both have a similar time to mach 1, and Su-34 has a slower wing rip speed.
Sui-34:


Tornado GR4:

Ok so you’re just completely stupid ha… My bad, I wont even begin to waste my time with the likes of you.

1 Like

Jesus man, you may be the most retarded player i have had the displeasure of knowing. Imma just block you as i truly think your stupid is contagious. good day to you sir.

6 Likes

Yeah, if you think any Tornado are superior airframe
I guess you better shut up for your own good really it makes you look like newbies who don’t knowledge about how stuff work yet you acting like you knew everything

Hah I knew this is what you always used when you start to lose typical

I hope this is irony (in any case I just spent the last two minutes crying with laughter)

2 Likes

LOL! All I did was criticize the Su-34 [F-111A] a slow heavy aircraft it is and I get insulted.
People can easily interpret those insults as coming from Russians.

Guys guys, the F-111A [Su-34] is equal to the Mig-21MF [Tornado IDS], trust trust.

The good thing is he has just lost any kind of credibility he thought he may of had with such an idiotic statement like that, so silver linings i suppose.

2 Likes

You’re sinking, stop it’s not worth it. it’s getting embarrassing

@Captain-Bollox
Well, sir Russian. You can claim that F-111A [Su-34] is the best fighter in the game all you want.
But that won’t change reality.

@Mathll
What hole? I’m not the one claiming that a 30,000kg plane that has a TWR of 0.80 is ground breaking.

Yeah, you, see? he starts yapping about anyone that prove him wrong as Russian main
it typical of him

No Dual Mode Brimstone was, which is the version we have in game.

@ARK_BOI
No one proved me wrong.
Tornado IDS rates at ~12 degrees per second.
I guarantee Su-34 cannot do that.

Brimstone being so rubbish is pretty shit. Brimstones should have been amongst the best, but you choose to make them shit.

6 Likes

LOL how you even know even SU-34 don’t even in the game yet?
and dude my Tornado IDS ASSTA 1 alone i had like way more battle than your all three variants combine
I’m sure i know them well enough than you do and how it performs

They are not Russians. Whenever people have a discussion with you, this is what it looks like:

5 Likes

Added these to the post: Even Su-27 loses to Tornado IDS in a poorly simulated [In Su-34’s favor] Su-34 comparison.

Spoiler

@HondaCivici
When people don’t test aircraft after they’ve been buffed, let alone try to simulate similar fuel loads vs a superior airframe.
Then call people stupid for criticizing Russian aircraft for not being as good as Russia claims them to be… ehhh.

Its pure bliss not having to read his dribble, i would highly recommend to anyone else just to simply mute him for a year. It works wonders.

3 Likes