@Navy_Phantom
So you think the US military is a fantasy book? LOL! LMAO! Yes, accuse the US military of being fantasy dude.
Good lord, the amount I defend NATO equipment from blatant misinformation… it feels lonely sometimes.
🤣🤣🤣
Told you he’s entertaining.
1 Like
Learn to read, we’re talking about how it performs in game not in real life
1 Like
@HondaCivici I’ve exclusively talked about in-game performance when talking about in-game equipment, so glad you and I agree there.
Of course you can’t talk about battle records vs battle records, cause that’s people performance rather than vehicle performance.
If it’s a waste of time for you to explain your position and defend it, don’t say anything in the first place. Again for every point you made, I made a valid counter point which you refused to counter yourself or acknowledge .
Site your sources first. I’m not going to take your word for it.
1 Like
Sources for what?
You have to be specific and direct with me.
On top of that, it’s only a waste of time to participate in petty drama as a whole. I hate drama because I saw family consumed by it and I myself avoid it.
I ONLY CARE ABOUT LEARNING AND SHARING.
I am not opening my files cause it includes personally identifiable information, but I do show how much space the files make up.
As for your posts, I read them all that you’ve pinged me on. Acknowledgement I could’ve DM’d you; however, take this post as me acknowledging every post and point you made. I don’t do well on portraying my acknowledgement in text form, never have despite me attempting to do better. So I hope you can forgive that flaw in my capability.
Jeez man how can he compare ka52 to apache bruh. Apache is worst in almost every aspect. Its so obvious. Also what drugs may i ask does he take? Strawberry ones?
1 Like
I can also make 27 petabyte zipbomb and call it manuals 🙃
Ohh that’s nothing, he also claims that Harrier Gr.7 with Mavericks is on par with Su-25SM3 that has Kh-38’s and never faces Pantsir lmao
1 Like
Wouldnt be surprised if he said so
@bertgame
Apache gets a missile with a far better warhead, Ka-52 gets a missile that goes faster.
Those are the primary differences, and it’s largely personal preference on which you prefer.
It’s okay to prefer speed, it’s not okay to claim that speed is everything.
It’s okay to prefer beam riding/laser guidance. Beam riding is however inferior to laser, IR, and radar guidance as NATO AND Russia found out.
Of course players have more practice with beam riding before they get to laser munitions in War Thunder so the experience disparity can easily have people prefer what they’re comfy with.
And no, to those of us that are American, it’s not obvious because we don’t believe Russia’s claims that they make a better helicopter, and War Thunder’s representation shows
windirstat shows zip files as zip files.
Here’s an image that includes file count:
When your information comes from you tubers and other sources, site them. No one is going to take your word for it. With hellfires, mavericks, etc. Almost all your takes regarding those are incorrect.
It’s not petty drama when you’re being called out for spreading misinformation.
If you’re using manual,documents,etc site them
1 Like
That’s a fair request.
However, claiming that people are spreading misinformation just cause they hold a different PERSPECTIVE on weapons is not respectful.
I have never once claimed someone was spreading misinformation for claiming Falanga’s better than i-TOW or vice-versa, cause it’s a bit of personal preference with those two missiles for example.
Lmao, where did I say that YOU haven’t faced Pantsir? 🤣
What I said is:
I was obviously talking about the vehicle and not you.
The way to word that is “Su-25SM3, an aircraft that doesn’t face Pantsir.” which doesn’t matter since Harrier GR7 out-ranges Pantsir… almost as if I know from personal experience using my Harrier GR7.
Beam riding worse? Like if shooting trough smoke and shooting down planes/helis 8km away isnt enough. Not to mention its stupidly broken damage model.
I was joking about file sizes. My point is that its easy to fake 😑
1 Like
Oh yea and typical ka50 gameplay looks like:
- spawn
- press hover button
- go to space
- shoot moving things
- call it skill
Shooting through smoke is a gamble, and you can’t continuously ripple fire.
You may PREFER the ability to go through smoke with a faster missile, and that’s fine.
It’s not an objectively better thing than continuous ripple fire with a superior warhead though.
Better to assume people are being sincere.
After all, I never once said AGM-114 is objectively superior to Vikhr in anything other than warhead/anti-armor capability.
Yea… If u immobilize tank with vikchr and he pops smoke u can kill him very very easily meanwhile hellfire(any other missile thats not vickhr) goes nuts when it sees smoke
Also if u would ask people what missile would choose 90% will say vickhr and other 10% that choose hellfire are people that dont play toptier or are ultra fanboys
Yes but saying beam riding is worse is absurd
I dont believe in utopia
“Trust but verify.” use to be standard practice on the Internet.
Also, people learn beam riding missiles prior to laser missiles.
in-fact, BMP-2M is the only ground vehicle that uses laser guided missiles.
And the earliest aircraft are 10.x.