I can also make 27 petabyte zipbomb and call it manuals 🙃
Ohh that’s nothing, he also claims that Harrier Gr.7 with Mavericks is on par with Su-25SM3 that has Kh-38’s and never faces Pantsir lmao
1 Like
Wouldnt be surprised if he said so
@bertgame
Apache gets a missile with a far better warhead, Ka-52 gets a missile that goes faster.
Those are the primary differences, and it’s largely personal preference on which you prefer.
It’s okay to prefer speed, it’s not okay to claim that speed is everything.
It’s okay to prefer beam riding/laser guidance. Beam riding is however inferior to laser, IR, and radar guidance as NATO AND Russia found out.
Of course players have more practice with beam riding before they get to laser munitions in War Thunder so the experience disparity can easily have people prefer what they’re comfy with.
And no, to those of us that are American, it’s not obvious because we don’t believe Russia’s claims that they make a better helicopter, and War Thunder’s representation shows
windirstat shows zip files as zip files.
Here’s an image that includes file count:
When your information comes from you tubers and other sources, site them. No one is going to take your word for it. With hellfires, mavericks, etc. Almost all your takes regarding those are incorrect.
It’s not petty drama when you’re being called out for spreading misinformation.
If you’re using manual,documents,etc site them
1 Like
That’s a fair request.
However, claiming that people are spreading misinformation just cause they hold a different PERSPECTIVE on weapons is not respectful.
I have never once claimed someone was spreading misinformation for claiming Falanga’s better than i-TOW or vice-versa, cause it’s a bit of personal preference with those two missiles for example.
Lmao, where did I say that YOU haven’t faced Pantsir? 🤣
What I said is:
I was obviously talking about the vehicle and not you.
The way to word that is “Su-25SM3, an aircraft that doesn’t face Pantsir.” which doesn’t matter since Harrier GR7 out-ranges Pantsir… almost as if I know from personal experience using my Harrier GR7.
Beam riding worse? Like if shooting trough smoke and shooting down planes/helis 8km away isnt enough. Not to mention its stupidly broken damage model.
I was joking about file sizes. My point is that its easy to fake 😑
1 Like
Oh yea and typical ka50 gameplay looks like:
- spawn
- press hover button
- go to space
- shoot moving things
- call it skill
Shooting through smoke is a gamble, and you can’t continuously ripple fire.
You may PREFER the ability to go through smoke with a faster missile, and that’s fine.
It’s not an objectively better thing than continuous ripple fire with a superior warhead though.
Better to assume people are being sincere.
After all, I never once said AGM-114 is objectively superior to Vikhr in anything other than warhead/anti-armor capability.
Yea… If u immobilize tank with vikchr and he pops smoke u can kill him very very easily meanwhile hellfire(any other missile thats not vickhr) goes nuts when it sees smoke
Also if u would ask people what missile would choose 90% will say vickhr and other 10% that choose hellfire are people that dont play toptier or are ultra fanboys
Yes but saying beam riding is worse is absurd
I dont believe in utopia
“Trust but verify.” use to be standard practice on the Internet.
Also, people learn beam riding missiles prior to laser missiles.
in-fact, BMP-2M is the only ground vehicle that uses laser guided missiles.
And the earliest aircraft are 10.x.
7 Likes
You are at least 30.2% more effective at finding documents than I.
Nice.
1 Like
Mostly thanks to Flame, hes the archives explorer, truly based activities.
2 Likes
I want Brimstones to be as correct as possible.
Goth muted me cause I want Brimstones to be as correct as possible.
Goth only wants Russia to have good toys.
Goth claimed that British tech tree defenders are below him.
Typical and sad.
This is what Goth thinks of ANYONE that dares push for accurate British vehicles:
You do tend to piss a lot of us off for no reason and when we do make a valid point you shrug it and respond claiming we were in the wrong, If you didn’t want folks to insult you then you should seriously look into a mirror and accept when you’re in the wrong on something. Not referring to this case though. Anyway, that’s all I gotta say since Brimstones are not something I’m good at but going by what someone else said, unacceptable for them to not be accurate. Just don’t expect them to be a 1:1 accuracy it’s just not realistic nor feasible even DCS isn’t 100% accurate.
2 Likes
What are you talking about? I always acknowledge when I make mistakes.
And yeah, I was one that said it’d be unacceptable for them to not be accurate outside not having ARH cause ARH would be undefeatable.
And someone got mad that I dare want Brimstones to be accurate outside the ARH capability, and maybe insulting their precious Su-34.
make smoke block radar which is historical with multi spectrum smoke and dont allow LOAL problem solved