I’m not sure how exactly very subsonic boat of a missile is going to be “gamebreaking”, especially as this extra range WILL be kneecapped by requirement to having visual LoS first to get a POINT lock, then lock range will be soft limited by stabilization range of current 30km.
1 Like
It’s not that the KH38 is inaccurate, it’s that other nations don’t have any ordnance comparable in speed and damage to the KH38. Brimstones lack their FnF mode, AGM-187 not present, GBU-53s not present and all are rejected atp because of mmw seeker. Meanwhile the KH38 is mach 2.2 capable SAP-HE missile.
3 Likes
It had a mock up, as far as sources say there is no proof of it being built. With that logic it either shouldnt be available or make the koelian and others available again. Ik there is no IR brimstone variant but if reality can be warped for kh38 why not give the brimstone ir guidance as a place holder for the mmw until it comes and so nato has a usable agm.
1 Like
It was ever only a mockup. Not produced
while the damage might be true, regarding speed there is the ARMIGER
Max speed : Mach 4 in boost phase (signal alone claims Mach 6, hence disregardable)
Cruising speed : 3M
so you could argue ))))
1 Like
Hello, Smin!
I always bother you with complex technical and historical matters… don’t worry, this time I would like to ask you something far simpler!
Which is; would you forward this camouflage suggestion? ^^
Since many camouflages are coming this update, I figured this is a good time to try and have this one come to the game soon as well. This camouflage is a really basic yet essential one, much like the Russian late green paint, etc.
And if I may ask about any updates regarding Merkava’s famous turret chains? T-90M and the Namers already got chains months ago; I wonder why the Merkavas still haven’t got them even yet?
Well as long as a missile that was never produced is in the game and doesnt have a counterpart offseting the game balance the debate will continue.
I have seen your post, IMO the Armiger would mediocre at best, because of the only 20kg warhead, comparable in size to the CM502s which struggle to one-shot MBTs.
Hey.
Please make skin suggestions in the dedicated section: Skins - War Thunder — official forum
Its not something relevant to the dev server section as skins for the update are pre-planned in advance and already in production.
Nothing to currently report.
1 Like
Roger, on it, thanks!
I just hope it doesn’t take 3,000 years to be accepted and/or implemented, hahah.
2 Likes
Funny…Yeah, so where are our late production model variants such as the
Panzerkampwagen 38(t) Ausf. G
Panzerjager 38(t) mit 7.5 cm Pak 40/3 Ausf. M
15 cm Schweres Infanteriegeschutz 33/1 auf Selbstfahrlafette 38(t) (Sf) Ausf. K
Sturmgeschutz III Ausf. G late
10.5 cm Sturmhaubitze 42 Ausf. G late
15 cm SturmInfanteriegeschütz 33B
Sturmgeschutz IV
Jagdpanzer IV Ausf. F late
Sturmpanzer IV mit 15 cm StuH 43 Ausf. IV late
Any kind of Flammpanzer???
It has been +13 years since the game’s release & yet the majority of the German tree remains stuck in pre-1943 configurations, the most blatant offenders being the in-game StuG III G & the Ju 88 A, the latter consisting of an outdated pre-war Ju 88 A-1, early-war Ju 88 A-4, & nothing else as you can see here:
Did they at least add SC 1800s to the Do 217 E-2/E-4, He 111 H-6/H-16, & the Ju 88 A-1/A-4?
3 Likes
Brimstone had no IR guidance. There are no sources of information for this at all.
This is not the case for the Kh-38MT and its IR seeker.
Every nation has longstanding requests and suggestions. Sadly they cant all come at once taking into account everything else people wish to see.
Ah, too bad
That wasnt something that broke any rule, why was it removed?
1 Like
I think it was a possible modification from what i remember but wasn’t added in the end
This is the dev server feedback topic for people to leave constructive feedback. Please do not post off topic spam. Your post was neither feedback nor constructive.
Ik it was never made, planned, etc my point is that if an imaginary missile which only had a mockup is in game when mock up vehicles are not allowed, why not give it a gimped mmw guidance so its balanced and nato has a counterpart to the Kh-38mt which was never built and the only “proof” of its existence is a mock up, not even a functional missile at an arms expo.
@Smin1080p_WT With LJDAM being added to more aircraft will we see them also added to the A-10C too as it should also carry them?
And also will LJDAM-ER also be coming to the aircraft that are getting LJDAM this update and the A-10C too?
1 Like
So anything goes for the russians with the KH-38, an armament that got a post with thousands of responses searching for a real source on the IR version, all they were able to find was the image that was shared earlier, no video being used, no reliable source, and yet it’s still in the game.
But god forbid for the rest of the nations to get something that even comes close to it