- Nobody needs Israel; everything that is there has already been pumped up in other countries, which means Gaijin is also not needed. 2) There is already evidence of my words in the game T55, IS-3, T-62 etc., but they were never given to Israel.
- There will be no balance because Turkey’s last hope has chosen the other side and it no longer fits into the setup.
- Finally, this is just business, and then personal views, and from this point of view, the USSR (T-55 am1 3 types of ammunition Br 8.7) and Germany (Tam 2ip) are more important than the balance of Israel.
1 Like
stop being russophobic there is no bias. you can cherry picked examples from any nation to make a bias claim
I don’t agree with you. And I think Israel can contribute. This is all your personal
opinion
Yes, it’s just a rumor lol
You know what you convinced me. But what do you suggest? Shouldn’t Israel be improved?
There are Magachs at 9.3 because of their speed and firepower.
2S38 is easy to deal with in an advanced M60 from my experience.
Soviets lack thermal imaging and speed, so their stuff is less effective.
T-55AMD1 is inferior to every 9.0 tank in the game. Same armor in many situations, far worse round.
Give T-55AMD1 M1000 from Finland’s T-55M and sure, it can go to 9.0.
All I know is I’d rather be in an M60 at 8.7 than a T-55AMD1. T-55’s ammo is harsh to work with.
It should be improved, ofc. But, sadly, it cant be improved without big br decompression and many other things.
1 Like
…what? My guy you do realize the is your own fault for putting a 9.0 or higher tank in your lineup right? The only place that it’s possible to have a 1.3 br uptier is against someone who only brought a couple of planes in air arcade (your br drops by .3 if you only if you bring one plane say for example one 9.0 and 1 or 2 8.7s will put you in the 8.7 MM, love abusing this in the J8F)
To be fair, Israel MBTs have atrocious BR placements.
7.7-9.0 has the same matchmaker because of the premiums present there (T-55AM1, Turms 3), 9.0 lineups are guaranteed to sealclub 8.0s 2/3 of the times.
9.3-11.0 is more of the same thanks to the 10.0 soviet lineup and other nations premiums. Merkavas 3, M1A1 and Type 90s tend to sealclub 10.0 soviets very often.
Look, there is a history of needing copy paste with many combinations from most existing trees. But also unique tools. Like the sherman Krupe, m50, Marmon Harrington with a French 37mm cannon, M10 with a m50 cannon, merkav sherman m50 (tomat/spg), roe’m l33 sherman, Cromwell with another cannon. (can’t remember which one) and I can go on. But it’s cool to have a tree with slightly different tools. You can look at the Yad Lashiryon website and look for more. Also the Pass to the devs suggestions here. This will be a huge response if I write everything I want.
Maybe even this can be more unique than rank1 to 3 China. It is possible and not difficult to do it
1 Like
I think people over-estimate how much compression there is by the way.
Like 9.0 and 8.7 vehicles are all balanced. Neither would be separated from their relative position to each other in decompression.
What?
In arcade I can see it cause I don’t play arcade.
But in RB their BR placements are identical to all other tech trees.
As a very general view, focusing only on 8.7-9.0 it’s not terrible. The problem becomes very apparent when you add 9.3 to 10.0 when you have a mere .3 gap between something a like a Type 74E and and XM-1. And all the vehicles that would keep things like the T-55AM and AMD in check quite easily like the Leopard A1A1 are vacuumed into 10.0 premium spam.
But I can’t justify saying the 55AM/AMD belong higher with essentially DM13 APDS equivalent, mid mobility that turns catastrophic 9.0+ and the Armour that would fair just as well as the mobility.
I run the A32A with 4 8.7 vehicles in my lineup.
Congratulations: you’re playing a 9.0 lineup with 4 8.7 tanks.
2 Likes
That’s entirely your fault then lmao. Brought it upon yourself for a stupid cas plane. The Saab 105 exists and is already a bit op for its br in ground. Air not so much but Gajoob already said they were finally gonna implement separate BRs for ground and air
By 0.3+ and I still function fine there.
1 Like
Still prefer the Lansen, as it has built in guns.
Continues playing my A4E outside spaa range and only playing 8.7 for cas… yeah idk if the 105 is OP for 8.3, have you tried the TU-2’s hot damn they are gross i love em
I sent you some pictures from the gallery. I have a feeling that this is enough for you, if China can be in the game with a big tree, so can Israel…
And what you sent is mostly pure existing clones. Unique vehicles are the ones not really suited for game (Like Azsahrit). And it still really small amount, not really suited for full TT (damn, just imagine BR gaps and small line ups).
Yep, China has the same problem of low rank clones, but the thing is… Everyone already said that it is bad long before. And it was the first time of something like this happeing. And nobody wanted this again. So thats why Gaijin made it started with rank 5. And even with this cut off Israeli TT is still full of copy cats with really small amount of unique vehicles.