The br system need balance

Yes, because shell shattering on a T-55 on an easy kill shot, shouldn’t happen. I don’t usually see Russian bias, but when I can’t front pen an angled IS-6’s weakspot because of shatter, it’s bullshit. Doesn’t happen on any other vehicles, just Russian ones. I play 8.7 Sweden, and regularly get up tiered and play against 10.0’s, and I don’t know how they expect me to penetrate a fucking T-80UD with a round with 337mm while in a Cheese Wedge. Saving grace is it’s speed and ability to set up early and flank, yet I still somehow have a positive KDR in the 103-C, just second nature vehicle ig.

2 Likes

No, it cant. It always will be cutted tree with many clones. Or you wanna exclude all this shot’s, magachs?

It is as common as downtiers. It can vary from bracket to bracket and from one nation to other, but overall it is quite common. Sadly, there is not much to be done here, except making extending brs.

Nope. Magach is still better in many aspects, hence why higher br placement.

Sho’t, Sho’t Kal Dalet, and Magach 1-7C are all their own separate vehicles from the original. In the Sho’t case, it’s a Centureon. In the Magach, I believe it’s the M48/60. However they are nothing alike other than the chassis they were built on. Oh, can’t forget the Tiran 1-4, it’s a heavily modified T-55. While “CP” it’s not really, as they are completely changed and modified to Israeli Defense Force specifications.

Start studying history instead of talking nonsense. Israel has an arsenal of weapons that can easily start from 1.0, with light, heavy tanks and artillery pieces. You have 0 idea about this topic.

So what are they? T-55AMD doesnt have thermals, LWS, have really bad gun handling comparing to 8.7 vehicles and bad reload. The only redeeming quality is APS and armor (which isnt ultimate and quite easily penetrated by most 8.7 tanks). Placing it at 9.3 will make it equal to XM-1 or things like MBT-70 (which is absolutely dumb).

Idk how you manage to play in 8.7 vehicles against 10.0

Yeah. full arsenal of… Of what? WW2 vehicles (that are pure copy-cats of existing).? Show me unique examples in quantity that are enough for this magical full tree and filling their 1-3 ranks.

Yes, as it’s a big ass gun for the reload. The tank wasn’t designed with an LWS, and most tanks don’t have one at this BR. I will give you the bad gun handling, and it’s a big ass gun. There is only one tank I can think of at this BR with thermals, and it’s the Cv9040B, and the Marder 1A3.

Edit: CV9030FN* as it’s a regular uptier

What do you prefer in 9.3? the merkava2 or m60 petton or the t72? what do you prefer the shot kal gimel or the t55 AMD 1? I don’t know just a question

100 mm. Yeah, big ass gun. Just like centurions with 105 mm gun. So bruh.
p.s. and i know that there things like free space for loader and etc (but you not mentiont them).

Yes. But it is still feauture that improves vehicle performance. What are you countering with this?

I mean, the Centureons have a 8 second reload, so it’s not great. I was thinking of the T-62’s 120mm gun. I meant shell size though, the NATO 105 is fairly light and small, but Russian ammo is kinda bulky.

I prefer tank with better reload, gun handling and thermals. And preferably fast. So i will not pick any of this.

Same as previous. Tank with better reload and gun handling.

Countering the fact you’re calling the T-55AMD-1 bad for its BR when nothing else has one. Just because it’s a premium doesn’t mean it has to bone everything at its BR (Like the T-80UD).

Eh… Shot kal gimel has 6.7 aced reload. T-55 AMD has 7.50.

T-62 has 115.

I didnt say that 55AMD is bad. I said, that it isnt good enough to be brought up in br placement. And it is not premium.

Ah, I’m not a religious Russian tank historian.

T-55 ammo:
image

Abrams 105mm:
image

L7 NATO 105mmR:
image

You also have to think on the ammo rack placement in the tanks, and how they differ.

Eh… Im not really good at visually confirming rounds, but on the upper photo are HE shells. And they both look quite heavy. But thats again, not the point.

I was thinking of the T-55AM-1

Actually you’re a turn coat and will be looked down upon from both sides

what? I did not understand? I don’t know the phrase. I play most trees at the moment. In reality I’m Jewish so I moved to Israel when Israel came into the game