PzH2000, edited the first comment too
I mean, you could give any 2A42/2A72 autocannon user APFSDS if you wanted to. I think there’s more interesting variants of the BMP-3 to add than one with slat armor, too. Possibly the Berezhok one for the TT, or there was also one with an Ataka launcher mounted on top of the turret.
1 Like
I just feel like they keep addint billions of light vehicles on the 9.0-10.3 range, but none to 11.0+, hahah.
I really would like to have higher-end/capability IFVs which could be more suitable for 12.0 gameplay. At least something 10.7 worthy or something.
1 Like
Kurganets-25 probably the best not so overpowered option for top tier IFV. T-15 Barbaris maybe not.
1 Like
Besides Russia of course lol.
There are dozens of variants of the BMP-3 to add and all we have is a relatively easy production one. We could get the AU-220 turreted BMP-3 for a TT 2S38 equivalent.
For higher tier, we could get the BMP-T, of course, or perhaps the T-15, or its predecessor the BTR-T.
2 Likes
Hey guys. We wanted to clarify that we have plans for a researchable BMD variant in the tree next year. As we mentioned, other variants were always within our plans to bring to the game.
9 Likes
Is it a BMD-4 variant?
If it isn’t, then that doesn’t address the problem of locking the BMD-4M as a premium.
8 Likes
But I want it now. (Peter Griffin reference)
Gaijin could do their favourite thing which is ctrl-c and ctrl-v, add BMD-4M to TT and everyone would be happy.
Nope, we have to wait till spring for BMD-1, then summer for BMD-2… And finally BMD-3/3M unless they decide to also make it premium, because russia clearly lacks options.
3 Likes
Nothing else but the caged BMD-4M.
This is just my opinion, but I think I speak for most of us when I say that, while I fully understand it’s a free game and Gaijin needs to make money, I’m extremely disappointed with this decision.
After all these years, when you finally add the vehicle to the game, it turns out to be a premium?
You mentioned, “we have plans for a researchable BMD variant in the tree next year.”
Honestly, at this point, just don’t bother adding it.
Out of the five updates this year (including Storm Warning), you added four premium vehicles and three copy-paste SPAAs. (I know the OSA technically isn’t copy-paste, but let’s be real everyone got the OSA.)
It’s both disappointing and disrespectful. But, C’est la vie
Thanks for everyone who tried to do something about, but we all know our beloved Gaijin.
BTW - Premium F-18 confirmed for next year.
12 Likes
That’s the problem.
Other than the Sinitsa which is half a BMP-3 anyway.
Even if this is true, the BMD-4M is an easy copy-paste case that gaijin always loved to do (see JA-37DI), you could even add APFSDS shells to the 30mm for the TT variant to make it somewhat defferent.
BMD variants were promised a long time ago and to see the second variant as a premium is sad at the very least.
6 Likes
A rare moment where people agrees with copy and paste but they don’t want to do it. How a crazy week, Gaijin* not wanting to do the easy way.
11 Likes
There is BMD-4M2. Same thing but with BMP-3 turret. This should be a premium instead since it’s not in production I think?
2 Likes
Also BMMP. 🙏
Surprised the Ja37D threads managed to convince them so easily then.
2 Likes
Lets be honest, Not enough money involved with the JA37DI.
6 Likes
BMD-4M being added to the TT would be a great Christmas gift, please Gaijin
4 Likes
Thanks for putting in the effort with this thread. Shame it was in vain, but thanks anyway.
1 Like