@csla1972
Nvm it was this video
1 Like
What minute?
56:25
Had to look for it myself
1 Like
SD-10 is close enough to be a Temu AMRAAM, so there’s that
SD-10 is the export version of the Pl-12
your problem is gone if you just ask for 0.7 BR Spread, no need for these “suggestions” that add ahistorical armament or downtier a very potent plane that is only gimped because it fights Typhoon and AMRAAM horde
PL-12 looks close enough to AMRAAM no? That’s the Temu AMRAAM
fair enough
It’s been shown at quite a few MAKS fairs.
I’d rather wait for a 30SM2 for the implementation of advanced eagles.
Shouldn’t even have it tbh, the 33 only received SPO-32 in the mid to late '00s. Even the in-game model shows SPO-15 receivers…
Eh, SA would just give more on par radar and missile count with SM.SM2 could go with an EX
1 Like
SU30SM2 is just a heavier Su-35S i dont understand why ppl are asking for it
To have a worse Su-35S.
Because it’s another R-37M platform. (Also canards looks cool regardless)
1 Like
Su-33 in game is with the Gefest upgrade (the HDD turns into an MFD is the big indication)
1 Like
Oh boy, it’s a decade newer then!
Does it matter? It’s still stuck with the N001
F-15A is fine but F-14B is pretty garbage.
AIM-54 is borderline useless to carry, the AIM-9L is EXTREMELY WEAK for 13.0 (one of the worst IR missiles available at the BR) and the 7M is also one of the weakest SARH options combined with an ancient radar.
2 Likes
I would say from a competitive sense this is true. But fortunately the average playerbase makes them at least viable to take.
In ASB I will generally run them unless the players in the match have demonstrated their ability to avoid them, and then switch to only AIM-7s after that