Stop killing Israeli TT BR-changes

Never said it can’t, but it’s unknown how good it actually is so guessing it for the sake of balancing is the right way.

You aren’t supposed to be on an equal footing when compared to a vehicle full BR higher than you, that’s not how it works.

That round is more than enough to deal with 11.0s.

Decades old designs don’t seem to be much of a problem.

It’s not.
Their neighbors are far from having a decent, let alone good, tech. We seen what they’ll most commonly face in the latest conflict.

yes but WHAT IF Egypt attack them with 1980 ABROOMS? they have to TANK THE SHOT! So israeli armor now can tank Godzilla atomic breath because israeli government makes it so!

the merkava 4 entered service in ~2002

they designed it in the 90s.

have you seen what egypt has?

the only reason the 2000 isnt a threat is because israel has good tanks that can hold their line and tank KE rounds

Im sorry who said the merkava is impenetrable to anything?

That’s a good post.

IF people want to argue decompression at 12.0 they can of course, even if I personally disagree at this time with current information and arguments.

Though ground does need decompression at 2.7, and that would increase the top BR by at least 0.7 just from decompressing 2.7.

1 Like

Are you afraid of 1980 abrams and M60???

The way you people say it sounds like this think can and will tank at least 13 different Kaiju death lazor.

yeah yeah, whatecer you say sweetie

I really like your “statshaming” word. If you trying to pretend like you know vehicle you should at very least have good kd on it and make good points relying on facts. You failed in both.

GL in your games. Youre just a below average player.

@CobarGG
If you think 2:1 KDR is below average, that’s lol.
The F-15E is on a KDR climb now that it’s performance spaded; cause news flash, bombing while good for consistent rewards, is not good for your precious statistics.

That and when I say something is OP, I don’t need to play it, I need to assess its capabilities vs the things it sees.
Which is how I know Su-30SM is OP without ever having to play it in ground RB.

11.0

No, 11.7 AT THE LOWEST.

Sabra belongs at 10.0.

There are more mistakes but I largely agree, they’re beating a dead horse with their BR changes.

1 Like


I’ve played the Merkava Mk.4M a lot, with a 3.5 K/D in it. I think it is fine at 12.0. The main problem with it is the existence of superior vehicles at the same BR, plus the teams. I think the 2A7’s/122’s could do with going up to 12.3.

Best they have are M1A1s.
Also, more than half of their tanks are T-55/62 and M60s, which definitely are massively inferior.

the M1A1SA came at the same time as the merkava

and “why should you develop any tanks, to fight tanks which are a decade older?”

a 120mm will still go through a merkava 2 and 3

Civil disagreement of perspectives instead of insults?
Dang, wish more posts were like this. :)

Might do, but in general their neighbors are far from being up to date when it comes to tech, especially ones they already were in war with.

yeah they are more advanced because they made the merkava, which is much much better

thats the point

Those countries don’t have the money for creating or buying good tanks, which Israel knows very well.

This is why Israel is pushing CE protection so hard, they know that most of their engagements will be against ATGMs or RPGs fired in an urban environment.

Haven’t you heard, only minor nations get nerfs and things taken out of it. When’s the last time Gaijin nerfed America or Germany? I’m talking big nerfs, not the turret basket. The only thing I can think of is slightly nerfing the ADATS and FlaRakRad. Otherwise they are still OP.

1 Like