I am talking about weapon count carried. I give no regards to your personal opinion for how future planes will fit the meta.
And you get five stars on your screen and all the red bois are now looking for you specifically. and they bring helis. wait that was gta. nevermind
1 Like
There is no argument. I am correct in this manner. You don’t even want to read the whole post first.
Poor engine :(
Nah you guys are just bad players. i only have won a handful of matches with USA mains. today i won 1 match with US mains in the span of the entire month.
The loader rotating isn’t loading @sartt do you understand you can turn it without loading? No??
The moment the shell is picked up by the arm and flung into the chamber is the load time, chamber closes before the arm is fully reset. So at worst maybe a 3.91 sec load time.
1 Like
It owned the game for a year when the F-14 came out, F-14 IRIAF owned for a good bit, F-16s, F-15s, F-111s owner sim / F-4s.
F-86 is still pretty peak. AV-8c, etc etc.
USA has been the best air tech tree for a very long time. At its worst it is equal to other nations, but most of the time it is ahead of everyone else.
But anyways back to USA tanks.
Yeah but nothing like what he claims, his claims were wild to Say the least
On a bracket, not the entirety of top tier.
‘owning’ sim is the same award as owning arcade at those ranks: it is completely anedotical, it only shows those vehicles have decent situational awareness that in ARB isn’t that necessary given how the spotting system works, and you even get the red diamonds on the missiles.
It has been the most complete, but not necessarily the best. Assuming depth = effectiveness is something quite far from reality, otherwise you can go around and claim that GB is one of the best techtrees, when in reality it has serious flaws despite having a good amount of planes.
I don’t need to read the entire 600+ responses here, the argument you guys are having is entirely off-topic and literally just a flame fest.
Not that I haven’t, it’s just dumb to think that for so many pages you’ve just been slinging veiled insults and attacking each other over the entire time.
According to TS, on December 25 US had ~35% WRs and now, two months later, they’re at ~48% WRs without any buffs to M1s.
Players are definitely a big cause of their WR woes.
3 Likes
After it fires, the loader has to turn, select the round, lift it, then put it into the breach. That is the loading time.
IRL I see NO catastrophic hits to the breech or neck of an Abrams tanks by drones or other vehicle. Yet in game its the go to spot for a total kill. So easy you dont even need to scope, just point and click.
Two reasons
- It’s practically impossible for a drone to hit the ring it’s already difficult enough for a tank gunner.
- The neck probably does provide more protection I think the figure people quote is 200mm. It would make little difference to regular rounds but would probably stop auto cannons.
I’ve not seen that many complaints about the breech for the Abram’s though.
cuz usually breech armor are vulnerable parts but there was debate on it before, a person that work on the abrams have pictures of the part behind the “first” layer of the breech armor seemingly visible bolts/screws behind it. This suggest there are another armored part/block behind the “first” layer of armor in the breech
you obviously don’t remember the APS system being tested in the early 2000s on the stryker
a random czech guy? what?
because you have a bunch of anti u.s players on the forums. You’ll know who they are because they’ll be the same people replying to you, any and everytime you say something about the abrams they’ll just vote spam on you.
are you gaslighting me because im pretty sure im just only responding to you
could be but eh
no there are people who play this game and sit on forums spam voting u.s players posts.