Will you stop repeating this, it’s been shown to you by me they can reload faster than 6 seconds. There was also a government study done showing 5.3(I think) reload you’ve seen as well.
Your head-canon doesn’t make it true. The videos you post and cite don’t discount the government study showing the 5.3(again, I think, I don’t remember the exact number, but proof was provided to you in another thread by MiG-23 or someone like that) was the average for the loaders they studied.
No doubt
Doesn’t even make sense
does wet concrete count
Treatment of Nuclear and Radiological Casualties 2001, does not mention about the A2 SEP+ in this document
But 2010 Weapon Systems
but this does state that it seems like the SEP+ has another improve frontal armor upgrade again
and this long ahhh document that I might have to spend the next 3 days reading all of them for a vast conclusion
and 1 more thing, the Abrams is HEAVILY CLASSIFIED so information are gatekeeped. In conclusion 2 things may happen
i literally got the documents off the waybacktimemachine. that had a archived post of the page from the primex website. i truly don’t care what you believe and what ever weird obsession with this Czech guy you have, should stop.
the hull armor of sep v2 is able to easily stop 3bm60
I’d have to see it to believe it.
“Easily” is probably a bit of an over statement.
maybe not sep v2
sep v3 has more significant upgrade than the sep v2
upward 800mm ke on turret might be expected(base of it having NGA(basically super charge composite)+3rd(or 4rd) gen depleted uranium
as for hull, sure
+0.00001 gjn - keep fighting the good fight tovarish - i mean tesó
and i was only muted for 24h months ago
recently came back and the game is still rigged against US ground, nothing changed
Hmm, the nation that has arguably better vehicles than their peers in most BR’s is rigged to lose according to you. Sounds like a skill issue, get good ig
that’s cool, too bad that this topic is about top tier
Should’ve been more specific then 🤷🏻♂️
Top tier is the most popular, complex and compressed BR - and it’s in the title of this thread.
Either you’re in the double digits or you were making a bad faith argument, either way not worth my time
If you insist, sure, not my problem
I wasn’t talking purely about sim, you know that, I know that.
I didn’t hide your post.
I’ve also been flagged by a certain someone, probably the guy under this your very comment I’m replying to.
Regarding Du with Sepv3 it still uses it because Australia required it to be taken out during the acquisition of their Sepv3s. And for DU being in the hull on sepv3 there is no concrete info on that front all we know both the hull and turret received NGAP. I would assume DU is the hull because it’s within NGAPs armor composition.
You mean sartt? And other USA mains who seeth at the truth?
I haven’t thrown a single insult you so claim. But please continue to justify your false flagging of my posts :)
again no. The computer for the loader reads the next input shell type, if no change, it preps in the meanwhile the gunner takes his shot.
If any had DU hull it would be SepV3 or higher.
That’s great, you can show 1 clip of a non-combat load, with an already started reload 😂 I can, and have shown MANY clips of that mythical 5.0 being next to impossible. Can maybe a crew or two out of everyone do it? Sure? But ACE crews shouldn’t be that common as they are in game then eh? The ace should be 5.5 secs that’s fair, and attainable. No less.
You cannot say I have not provided sufficient evidence for that to be true
Yup it is. Just like how USA has the most top tier premiums too.
RDFLT seems to be pretty good, click bait is excellent.
M1128 is always a good backup.
I am 99% certain the most played br range is 4.0 - 7.0
Last year the Turm III took the cake, so clearly 8.3 is pretty d**n popular
Nope… Stop being so paranoid with a you-vs-me mentality on a forum where discussion is a thing…